Benefits from engagement and leadership achieved by students co-creating science through Student Environment Research Teams (SERTs).
This case study evaluates the Purbeck Wildlife Student Environment Research Team (SERT (http://www.cocreate4science.org/serts/)) project, a collaboration between Bournemouth University (BU) and the National Trust (NT) with the overall aim of fostering student engagement and employability through team-based research that informs habitat management for wildlife conservation. The project has been supported by internal funding from BU since it began in 2015 and by funding in-kind from the NT since 2016. We report our findings on the challenges and opportunities arising from the project as identified from analysis of the overall experience of 42 students studying for a range of degrees in a range of environmental sciences and from the personal perspectives of three key stakeholders; a student leader, an academic mentor and our NT partner. Our key finding is that the SERT model is effective as a student engagement tool both for student leaders and participants. However, it is through fostering leadership skills that SERTs can most powerfully develop student learning and employability. We discuss how our partnership with the NT as an external organisation helps address challenges for some students of visualising how they can demonstrate tangible leadership skills and so develop vital transferable “soft” as well as subject- specific employability skills.
Andrews, J., & Higson, H. (2008). Graduate Employability, ‘Soft Skills’ Versus ‘Hard ’Business Knowledge: A European Study. Higher Education in Europe, 33(4).
Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2007). Self‐authorship: The foundation for twenty‐first‐century education. New directions for teaching and learning, 2007(109), 69-83.
Corker, C., & Holland, S. (2016). Using public engagement to enhance student engagement: An example from History. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 1(1).
Eyler, J. (2002). Reflection: Linking service and learning—Linking students and communities. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3), 517-534.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), 212-218.
Morley, D.A., Diaz. A., Blake, D., Burger, G., Dando, T., Gibbon, S, & Rickard, K (2018). ‘Student experience of real-time management of peer working groups during field trips’ Chapter 8. In: Morley, D. ed. Enhancing employability in higher education through work based learning. Palgrave Macmillan.
Walkington, H. (2015). Students as researchers: Supporting undergraduate research in the disciplines in higher education. The Higher Education Academy.
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).