Empowering students as partners in enhancing assessment practice, using the research-informed EAT framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66561/sehej.v7i3.1246Keywords:
Assessment, EAT Framework, Student PartnersAbstract
Developing self-regulatory skills is fundamental to effective learning in higher education, and assessment has a key role to play in this process. Assessment designed to support self-regulation drives student agency, independence, and criticality, provided students are engaged with the assessment activity. Student partnership is valuable in evaluating the benefits and limitations of assessments, and in enhancing their impact. Student engagement can be achieved either through actively understanding the core elements of the assessment, co-designing assessment tasks, or, active involvement in post hoc revision of assessments. A powerful conceptual approach for engaging students in assessment is the ‘Equity, Agency, and Transparency’ (EAT) framework established in 2016 to support an integrated approach to assessment and feedback. EAT has three interrelated dimensions: assessment literacy, feedback and design. EAT resources (including tools for ranking assessments and an engagement scale) can be used for free by students and staff to view assessments objectively. This case study focuses on a series of activities which involve students using EAT to review a series of assessments and co-design interventions to enhance student assessment literacy and feedback. We describe how EAT can be used to initiate conversations about enhancement needs and to scaffold the development of a peer-led intervention. We found EAT effective in providing opportunities for students to participate in discourse around assessment and empowering them to support their own and each other’s learning. The outcomes of our assessment interventions highlight the benefits of involving students as active partners in developing and enhancing assessment and feedback practices.
Downloads
References
Andrews, M., Brown, R. and Mesher, L. (2018). Engaging students with assessment and feedback: Improving assessment for learning with students as partners. Practitioner Research in Higher Education Journal, 11(1), pp. 32-46.
Ball, S.B., Bew, C., Bloxham, S., Brown, S., Kleiman, P., May, H., McDowell, L., Morris, E., Orr, S., Payne, E., Price, M., Rust, C., Smith, B. and Waterfield, J. (2012). A marked improvement: Transforming assessment in Higher Education. The Higher Education Academy.
Bennett, R., & Kane, S. (2014). Students’ interpretations of the meanings of questionnaire items in the National Student Survey. Quality in Higher Education, 20(2), 129–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2014.924786
Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161 - 186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00015-1
Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 445-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2
Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698-712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in staff student partnerships. Higher Education, 71(2), 195-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4
Bovill, C., Matthews, K.E. & Hinchliffe, T. (2021). Student partnerships in assessment (SPiA). York: Advance HE. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/student-partnership-assessment-spia
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2013) Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. SAGE Publication, London.
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: a guide for faculty. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Deeley, S. J., Fischbacher-Smith, M., Karadzhov, D., & Koristashevskaya, E. (2019). Exploring the ‘wicked’ problem of student dissatisfaction with assessment and feedback in higher education. Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2019.1644659
Dunne, E., & Zandstra, R. (2011). Students as Change Agents: New Ways of Engaging with Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. Bristol: Escalate.
Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312474350
Evans, C. (2016). Enhancing assessment feedback practice in higher education: The EAT framework. Southampton, UK: University of Southampton. https://eatframework.com
Evans, C. (2020). Enhancing assessment feedback practice in higher education: The EAT Framework. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/417264/2/EAT_Integrated_Assessment_Evans_2020.pdf
Evans, C. (2022). The EAT framework: Enhancing assessment and feedback practice in higher education. https://inclusiveheorg.files.wordpress.com/2022/12/eat_framework_12_2022.pdf
Evans, C., Amici-Dargan, S., Rutherford, S., & Vieira, F. & Erasmus Team (2022). A Guide to Using the EAT Assessment Framework: A Resource for Developing Assessment Practice in Higher Education. https://inclusivehe.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/using_eat_guide-2022_12_2022.pdf
Evans, C., & Bunescu, L. (2020). (Eds.). (2020, March). Student assessment: Thematic peer group report. European University Association EUA. https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/eua%20report%20student%20assessment_web.pdf
Evans, C., Kay, W., Amici-Dargan, S., De Miguel González, R., Donert, K., & Rutherford, S. (2024). Developing a scale to explore self-regulatory approaches to assessment and feedback with academics in higher education. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1357939
Evans, C., with Rutherford, S, & ERASMUS TEAM (2021). A self-regulatory approach to assessment in higher education. Cardiff: University of Cardiff with Erasmus+. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357172330_A_self-regulatory_approach_to_assessment_in_higher_education
Evans, C. & Waring, M. (2020). Enhancing students’ assessment feedback skills within higher education. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093
Evans, C., & Waring, M. (2024). Chapter 26: Prioritising a self-regulatory assessment and feedback approach in higher education in C. Evans and M. Waring. (Eds.), Research Handbook on Innovations in Assessment and Feedback in Higher Education: Implications for Learning and Teaching (pp. 479-515). ELGAR Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800881600.00036
Evans, C., & Zhu, X. (2023). The development and validation of the assessment engagement scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1136878
Gravett, K., Kinchin, I. M., & Winstone, N. E. (2020). ‘More than customers’: conceptions of students as partners held by students, staff, and institutional leaders. Studies in Higher Education, 45(12), 2574-2587. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1623769
Hawe, E., & Dixon, H. (2017). Assessment for learning: a catalyst for student self-regulation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1181-1192. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1236360
Healey, R.L., Lerczak, A., Welsh, E. & France, D. (2019) By any other name? The impacts of differing assumptions, expectations, and misconceptions in bringing about resistance to staff-student partnership. International Journal for Students as Partners, 3(1), 106-122.
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. York: Higher Education Academy.
Jones, I., & Alcock, L. (2014). Peer assessment without assessment criteria. Studies in Higher Education, 39(10), 1774-1787. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.821974
Lynam, S., & Cachia, M. (2018) Students’ perceptions of the role of assessments at higher education, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1329928
MacKay, J. R. D., Hughes, K., Marzetti, H., Lent, N., & Rhind, S. M. (2019). Using National Student Survey (NSS) qualitative data and social identity theory to explore students’ experiences of assessment and feedback. Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2019.1601500
Matthews, K.E., & Cook-Sather, A. (2021). Engaging students as partners in assessment and enhancement processes. In: Shah, M., Richardson, J.T.E., Pabel, A., Oliver, B. (eds) Assessing and Enhancing Student Experience in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80889-1_5
Matthews, K.E., Tai, J., Enright, E., Carless, D., Rafferty, C., & Winstone, N. (2023). Transgressing the boundaries of ‘students as partners’ and ‘feedback’ discourse communities to advance democratic education, Teaching in Higher Education, 28(7), 1503-1517. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1903854
Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014) Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 39(1) 102-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
Nicol, D. (2021). The power of internal feedback: exploiting natural comparison processes, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46:5, 756-778. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1823314
Perera, J., Lee, N., Win, K., Perera, J., & Wijesuriya, L. (2008) Formative feedback to students: the mismatch between faculty perceptions and student expectations. Medical Teacher. 30(4),395-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590801949966
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535-550. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541015
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In J. P. Mestre & B. H. Ross (Eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Cognition in Education (pp. 37–76). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8
Zhao, X., Cox, A., Lu, A., & Alsuhaibani, A. (2022). A comparison of student and staff perceptions and feelings about assessment and feedback using cartoon annotation, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46:5, 586-604. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1986620
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. J. Educ. Psychol., 81, 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
