The feedback cafe: Creating opportunities for dialogue between students and staff regarding assessment and feedback.
Keywords:
Feedback, Assessment, Student Partnership, Student Engagement, Assessment LiteracyAbstract
Feedback practices in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) are often ineffective due to a combination of high staff workloads, low levels of student engagement and inadequate assessment literacy. To improve assessment literacy and student engagement with feedback at a UK HEI we introduced a Feedback Café initiative. Our Feedback Café was co-developed with students and has run for three years as a drop-in stall, manned by educators and student partners. The Feedback Café provides regular opportunities for students to ask questions about assessments and supports them to interpret and use feedback effectively. To explore student perceptions of the Feedback Café we surveyed two cohorts of Year 1 – 4 undergraduates (2021-22 N = 767; 2022-23 N = 729) gathering quantitative and qualitative data. Thematic analysis conducted on open-text responses revealed ways in which the Feedback Café was useful, barriers to attendance, and suggestions on how to improve through ongoing staff-student partnerships. The Feedback Café is generalizable to any subject and provides students with opportunities for two-way dialogue with relatively low staff workload. By sharing our insights, we aim to contribute to the efforts to improve assessment and feedback practices in HEIs and provide a guide for those interested in implementing a Feedback Café initiative.
Downloads
References
Archbell, K. A., & Coplan, R. J. (2022). Too Anxious to Talk: Social Anxiety, Academic Communication, and Students’ Experiences in Higher Education. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 30(4), 273-286. https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266211060079
Ball, H. L. (2019). Conducting online surveys. Journal of Human Lactation, 35(3), 413 – 417. 10.1177/0890334419848734
Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (2nd ed.). Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Boud, D. (2007). Reframing assessment as if learning were important. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 14 – 25). Routledge.
Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (Eds.). (2007). Rethinking assessment in higher education. Routledge.
Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Hayfield, N. (2024). Thematic analysis: A reflexive approach. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Brown, S., & Knight, P. (1994). Assessing Learners in Higher Education. Kogan Page.
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315 – 1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2011). Developing Sustainable Feedback Practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 395 – 407. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003642449
Carless, D., & Winstone, N. (2020). Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(1), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372
Cook-Sather, A., & Luz, A. (2015). Greater engagement in and responsibility for learning: what happens when students cross the threshold of student-faculty partnership. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(6), 1097 – 1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.911263
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage.
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advances in mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209 – 240). Sage.
Dawson, P., Henderson, M., Mahoney, P., Phillips, M., Ryan, T., Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2019). What makes for effective feedback: Staff and student perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 25 – 36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1467877
Delva, D., Sargeant, J., Miller, S., Holland, J., Alexiadis Brown, P., Leblanc, C., Lightfoot, K., & Mann, K. (2013). Encouraging residents to seek feedback. Medical Teacher, e1625–31. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.806791
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative press. D.C. Heather & Co Publishers.
Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70 – 120. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312474350
Evans C., & Waring M. (2011). Student teacher assessment feedback preferences: The influence of cognitive styles and gender. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(3), 271 – 280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.011
Fraser, B. (1987). Identifying the salient facets of a model of student learning: A synthesis of meta-analyses. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 187 – 212.
Grundmann F, Epstude K, Scheibe S. (2024) Whether and how to regulate: Emotion regulation in negative-feedback situations. J Exp Psychol Gen. 153(5):1281-1308. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001566
Henderson, M., Molloy, E., Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. (2019). Designing Feedback for Impact. In M. Henderson, R. Ajjawi, D. Boud, & E. Molloy (Eds.), The Impact of Feedback in Higher Education (pp. 267 – 285). Palgrave Macmillan.
Office for Students (2024). National Student Survey (NSS). Retrieved November 29, 2024, from: https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/for-providers/student-choice-and-flexible-learning/national-student-survey-nss/
Howard, E. (2020). A review of the literature concerning anxiety for educational assessments. Ofqual. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5e45825340f0b677bf6eb3ea/A_review_of_the_literature_concerning_anxiety_for_educational_assessment.pdf
Juwah, C., Macfarlane-Dick, D., Matthew, B., Nicol, D., Ross, D., & Smith, B. (2004). Enhancing student learning through effective formative feedback. The Higher Education Academy.
Larson, R. B. (2019). Controlling social desirability bias. International Journal of Market Research, 61(5), 534 – 547. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785318805305
Leonardo, Z. (2004). Critical social theory and transformative knowledge: The functions of criticism in quality education. Educational Researcher, 33(6), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033006011
Li, J., & De Luca, R. (2014). Review of assessment feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 378 – 393. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.709494
Moores, E., Birdi, G. K., & Higson, H. E. (2019). Determinants of university students’ attendance. Educational Research, 61(4), 371 – 387. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1660587
Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501 – 517. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003786559
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199 – 218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
Norcini, J., Anderson, B., Bollela, V., Burch, V., Costa, M. J., Duvivier, R., Galbraith, R., Hays, R., Kent, A., Perrott, V. and Roberts, T. (2011). Criteria for good assessment: Consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Medical Teacher, 33(3), 206 – 214. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.551559
Nowell, L. S., Norria, J.M., White, D. E. and Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Nvivo qualitataive data analysis. Version 12 [software]. QSR international Ltd. 2018. Available from: https://community.lumivero.com/s/nvivo-knowledge-base?language=en_US
Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 345–375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.345
Poulos, A., & Mahony, M. J. (2008). Effectiveness of feedback: The students’ perspective. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 143 – 154. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930601127869
Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O'Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277 – 89. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541007
Price, M. (2012). Assessment Literacy: The Foundation for Improving Student Learning. Oxford Brookes University.
Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J. (2011). Feedback: Focusing Attention on Engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.483513
Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353 – 387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838
RStudio Team (2023). RStudio (version 2023.06.2 + 561) [Computer software]. Posit, PBC. https://posit.co/
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. Jossey-Bass.
Sutton, P. (2012). Conceptualizing feedback literacy: knowing, being, and acting. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.647781
University and College Union (UCU). (2022). Workload survey report: June 2022. Available at: https://www.ucu.org.uk/media/12905/WorkloadReportJune22/pdf/WorkloadReportJune22.pdf
Williams, J., & Kane, D. (2009). Assessment and Feedback: Institutional experiences of student feedback, 1996 to 2007. Higher Education Quarterly, 63(3), 264–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2009.00430.x
Wills, T. A., & Shinar, O. (2000). Measuring perceived and received social support. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood, & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 86 – 135). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780195126709.003.0004
Winstone, N.E., Nash, R.A., Rowntree, J. and Parker, M. (2017). “It’d be useful, but I wouldn’t use it”: barriers to university students’ feedback seeking and recipience. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 2026 – 2041. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1130032
Woitt, S., Weidlich, J., Jivet, I., Orhan Göksün, D., Drachsler, H., & Kalz, M. (2023). Students’ feedback literacy in higher education: an initial scale validation study. Teaching in Higher Education, 30(1), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2023.2263838
Wright, K. B. (2017). Researching internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3), JCMC1034, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.x
Wu, M.-J., Zhao, K., & Fils-Aime, F. (2022). Response rates of online surveys in published research: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behaviour Reports, 7, 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100206
Yan, Z., & Carless, D. (2021). Self-assessment is about more than self: the enabling role of feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(7), 1116–1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2001431
Young, S., & Carless, D. (2024). Investigating variation in undergraduate students’ feedback seeking experiences: Towards the integration of feedback seeking within the curriculum. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(8), 1048–1060. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2338537
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
