Peer-to-Peer Phone Calls as a Method of Providing Proactive and Personalised Support to Enhance Student Engagement
Abstract
Disruptive changes to the lives of students and running of universities, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, has forced institutions to adapt their approaches to supporting students (Crawford et al., 2020; Frampton & Smithies, 2021). Student engagement has long been regarded by universities as an important indicator for other aspects of student success (Kahu, 2013), but with many varying approaches and definitions (Ashwin & Mcvitty, 2015). Furthermore, the potential involvement of current students to provide peer-to-peer support has received much attention in previous research (Stigmar, 2016; Raisanen et al., 2020; Ala et al., 2021). What has not been thoroughly investigated is how different communications channels, such as phone calls, can be utilised as methods to provide supportive interventions to students. This article provides insights into how supportive peer-to-peer phone interventions within a context of blended learning can have an impact on both students’ levels of engagement and their confidence levels. This was achieved through a mixed-methods approach utilising results of a student questionnaire, targeted at those who had received such supportive interventions, and a detailed analysis of student engagement and progression data. The results show that phone call interventions by peers can lead to increased short-term levels of student engagement, especially when targeted nearer the start of an academic year. Meanwhile, multiple phone call interventions throughout the year leads to a cumulative effect where students continue to see an increase in engagement beyond the months of individual interventions. It is only when students received multiple phone call interventions that they had a significantly higher likelihood to progress in their studies. The process of attempting to call, but not reaching, students also helps to identify students who are then likely to exhibit lower levels of engagement throughout the rest of the academic year. Students who received a phone call intervention reported increases in confidence levels and awareness of support. Almost nine in ten students reported taking at least one proactive action following their supportive call with a peer.
Downloads
References
Ala, O.G., Yang, H., & Ala, A.A. (2021). Leveraging integrated peer-assisted learning clusters as a support for online learning. Interactive Learning Environments.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1943454
Allen, C. & Parkes-Norris, A. (2021). Experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic – Student survey November 2020. Unite Students report. https://www.unite-group.co.uk/media/93-students-intend-stay-university-despite-covid-19-challenges-12-november-2020
Aristovnik, A., Kerzic, D., Ravselj, D., Tomazevic, N., & Umek, L. (2020). Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on life of higher education students: A global perspective. Sustainability, 12 (20), 8438. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208438
Ashwin, P. & McVitty, D. (2015). The meanings of student engagement: Implications for policies and practices. In Curaj A., Matei L., Pricopie R., Salmi J., & Scott P. (Eds). The European Higher Education Area, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20877-0_23
Baron, P. & Corbin, L. (2012). Student engagement: rhetoric and reality. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(6), 759 – 772. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.655711
Bhardwa, S. (2018). Student Experience Survey 2018: Keeping mental health in mind. Times Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/student/news/student-experience-survey-2018-keeping-mental-health-mind
Bradley, H. (2017). ‘Should I stay or should I go?’: Dilemmas and decisions among UK undergraduates. European Educational Research Journal, 16(1), 30 – 44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116669363
Breier, M. (2010). From ‘financial considerations’ to ‘poverty’: Towards a reconceptualisation of the role of finances in higher education student drop out. Higher Education, 60(6), 657 – 670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9343-5
Cameron, J., Roxburgh, M., Taylor, J., & Lauder, W. (2010). Why students leave in the UK: An integrative review of the international research literature. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20(7), 1086 – 1096. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03328.x
Campbell, A. (2015). Introducing a buddying scheme for first year pre-registration students. British Journal of Nursing, 24(20), 992 – 996. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2015.24.20.992
Chaka, C. & Nkhobo, T. (2019). Online module login data as a proxy measure of student engagement: The case of myUnisa, MoyaMA, Flipgrid, and Gephi at an ODeL institution in South Africa. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(38). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0167-9
Childers, C. & Levenshus, A. (2016). Bringing the digital world to students: partnering with the university communications office to provide social media experiential learning projects. Communication Teacher, 30(4),190 – 194. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2016.1219041
Coates, H. (2005). The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 11(1), 25 – 36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320500074915
Coman, C., Tiru, L.G., Mesesan-Schmitz, L., Stanciu, C., & Bularca, M.C. (2020). Online teaching and learning in higher education during the Coronavirus pandemic: Students’ perspective. Sustainability, 12(24), 10367. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410367
Connell, J. P. & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe, Minnesota symposium on child psychology: self-processes and development. University of Chicago Press
Cortez, M. (2017). Students find University Apps helpful, but want more personalization. EdTech. https://edtechmagazine.com/higher/article/2017/12/students-find-university-apps-helpful-want-more-personalization
Cowell, P. (2021). COVID-19 has changed university teaching – here are five things to stick with in the future. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/covid-19-has-changed-university-teaching-here-are-five-things-to-stick-with-in-the-future-152287
Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., Magni, P.A., & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3(1), 1 –20. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7.
Deng, J., Zhou, F., Hou, W., Silver, Z., Wong, C., Chang, O., Drakos, A., Zuo, Q., & Huang, E. (2021). The prevalence of depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms and sleep disturbance in higher education students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Research, 301, 113863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113863
Devenish, R., Dyer, S., Jefferson, T., Lord, L., Leeuwen, S.V., & Fazarkerley, V. (2009). Peer to peer support: The disappearing work in the doctoral student experience. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 59 – 70. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360802444362
Dobbins, C. & Denton, P. (2017). MyWallMate: An investigation into the use of mobile technology in enhancing student engagement. TechTrends, 61, 541 – 549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0188-y
Fenton, A. & Lambert, M. (2019). Student mental health in the healthcare professions: exploring the benefits of peer support through the Bridge Network. The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice, 15(2), 84 – 94. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMHTEP-03-2019-0015
Finnerty, R., Marshall, S.A., Imbault, C., & Trainor, L. J. (2021). Extra-curricular activities and well-being: Results from a survey of undergraduate university students during COVID-19 lockdown restrictions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 647402. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647402
Foster, E. & Siddle, R. (2019). The effectiveness of learning analytics for identifying at-risk students in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(6), 842 – 854. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1682118
Frampton, N. & Smithies, D. (2021). University mental health: Life in a pandemic. Student Minds. https://www.studentminds.org.uk/uploads/3/7/8/4/3784584/2021_ir_full_report_final.pdf
Geven, K. & Attard, A. (2012). Time for student-centred learning? In A. Curaj, P. Scott, L. Vlasceanu, & L. Wilson (Eds). European Higher Education at the Crossroads. Springer.
Hammill, J., Nguyen, T., & Henderson, F. (2020). Student engagement: The impact of positive psychology interventions on students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 129 – 142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787420950589
Heidari, E., Mehrvarz, M., Marzooghi, R., & Stoyanov, S. (2021). The role of digital informal learning in the relationship between students' digital competence and academic engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(4), 1154 – 1166. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12553
Hillman, N. (2021). A short guide to non-continuation in UK universities. Higher Education Policy Institute Report. https://www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/A-short-guide-to-non-continuation-in-UK-universities.pdf
Hope, J. (2020). Consider ways to support students with ASD during the pandemic. Disability Compliance for Higher Education, 26(1), 4 – 5. https://doi.org/10.1002/dhe.30886
Hope, J. (2020). Support students’ changing needs throughout the pandemic. Disability Compliance for Higher Education, 25(2), 1 – 5. https://doi.org/10.1002/dhe.30868
Iglesias-Pradas, S., Hermández-Garcia, Á., Chaparro-Paláez, J., & Prieto, J.L. (2021). Emergency remote teaching and students’ academic performance in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 119, 106713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106713
Jones, A. & Wilkie, K. (2014). A teacher’s perspective of interacting with long-term absent students through digital communications technologies. Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 324, 187 – 192. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15378-5_18
Kahu, E. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758 – 773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
Krause, A.J. & Moore, S.Y. (2021). Creating an online peer-to-peer mentoring program: Promoting student relationships, engagement, and satisfaction during the era of COVID-19. College Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2021.1925624
Lederer, A., Hoban, M., Lipson, S., Zhou, S., & Eisenberg, D. (2021). More than inconvenienced: The unique needs of U.S. College students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Education & Behavior, 48(1), 14 – 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120969372
Longfellow, E., May, S., Burke, L., & Marks-Maran, D. (2008). ‘They had a way of helping that actually helped’: A case study of a peer-assisted learning scheme. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(1), 93 – 105. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510701794118
Macfarlane, B. & Tomlinson, M. (2017). Critiques of student engagement. Higher Education Policy, 30, 5 – 21. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-016-0027-3
Mantzios, M. (2020). Mental health first aid and exciting opportunities for peer-support networks within universities with prospects of influencing public health and treatment. Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice, 28, 219 – 221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-019-01057-5
Masika, R. & Jones, J. (2016). Building student belonging and engagement: Insights into higher education students’ experiences of participating and learning together. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(2), 138 – 150. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1122585
McIntosh, E. (2017). Working in partnership: The role of peer assisted study sessions in engaging the citizen scholar. Active Learning in Higher Education, 20(3), 233 – 248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417735608
McIntosh, E. & Mahony, E. (2020). Principles of student attendance and engagement. Middlesex University policy. https://www.mdx.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0039/579990/FV4-Principles-of-Student-Attendance-and-Engagement-2020-21.pdf
McIntosh, E., Thomas, L., Troxel, W., Wijnggaard, O., & Grey, D. (2021). Academic advising and tutoring for student success in higher education: International Approaches. Frontiers in Education, 6, 631265. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.631265
McIntosh, E., Gallacher, D., & Chapman, A. (2021). Update on student success tutoring (SST). Middlesex University project report.
Mestan, K. (2016). Why students drop out of the Bachelor of Arts. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(5), 983 – 996. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1139548
Montacute, R. & Holt-White, E. (2021). Covid-19 and the university experience. The Sutton Trust report. https://www.suttontrust.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Covid-19-and-the-University-Experience.pdf
Morrison, K. (2006). Developing reflective practice in higher degree students through a learning journal. Studies in Higher Education, 21(3), 317 – 332. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079612331381241
Oliveira, G., Teixeira, J.G., Torres, A., & Morais, C. (2021). An exploratory study on the emergency remote education experience of higher education students and teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52, 1357 – 1376. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13112
Office for National Statistics (2021). Coronavirus and higher education students: England, 24 May to 2 June 2021. ONS COVID-19 Insights Survey (SCIS) report. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/healthandwellbeing/bulletins/coronavirusandhighereducationstudents/england24mayto2june2021
Raisanen, M., Postareff, L., Mattsson, M., & Lindblom-Ylanne, S. (2020). Study-related exhaustion: First-year students’ use of self-regulation of learning and peer learning and perceived value of peer support. Active Learning in Higher Education, 21(3), 173 – 188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418798517
Siedel, E. & Kutieleh, S. (2017). Using predictive analytics to target and improve first year student attrition. Australian Journal of Education, 61(2), 200 – 218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944117712310
Stigmar, M. (2016). Peer-to-peer teaching in higher education: A critical literature review. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 24(2), 124 – 136. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2016.1178963
Stoller, E. (2015). Enhancing student services with digital engagement. Jisc blog. https://www.jisc.ac.uk/blog/enhancing-student-services-with-digital-engagement-11-jun-2015
Temple, P., Callender, C., Grove, L., & Kersh, N. (2014). Managing the student experience in a shifting higher education landscape. Higher Education Academy report. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/resources/managing_the_student_experience.pdf
Terrion, J.L. & Leonard, D. (2007). A taxonomy of the characteristics of student peer mentors in higher education: Findings from a literature review. Mentoring & Tutoring, 15(2), 149 – 164. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260601086311
Terrion, J.L. & Leonard, D. (2010). Motivation of paid peer mentors and unpaid peer helpers in higher education. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 8(1), 85 – 103. https://doaj.org/article/d38942802ef44b69979e9543148979b1
Thomas, L. (2012). Building student engagement and belonging in Higher Education at a time of change. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/resources/What_works_final_report.pdf
Tribal Group. (2016). Student communications in further and higher education. https://info.tribalgroup.com/student-survey-communication-preferences
Watts, H., Malliris, M., & Billingham, O. (2015). Online peer assisted learning: Reporting on practice. Journal of Peer Learning, 8, 85 – 104. https://ro.uow.edu.au/ajpl/vol8/iss1/8
Youde, A. (2020). I don’t need peer support: Effective tutoring in blended learning environments for part-time, adult learners. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(5), 1040 – 1054. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1704692
Zhai, Y. & Du, X. (2020). Addressing collegiate mental health amid COVID-19 pandemic. Psychiatry Research, 288, 113003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113003
Zheng, F., Khan, N.A., & Hussain, S. (2020). The COVID 19 pandemic and digital higher education: Exploring the impact of proactive personality on social capital through internet self-efficacy and online interaction quality. Children and Youth Services Review, 199, 105694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105694
Zumbrunn, S., McKim, C., Buhs, E., & Hawley, L.R. (2014). Support, belonging, motivation, and engagement in the college classroom: A mixed method study. Instructional Science, 42(5), 661 – 684. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43575253
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
