A PhD should not look like it’s fun: an actor network theory analysis of digital badges

Authors

  • Inger Mewburn Australian National University

Abstract

Do learners really want to engage with digital badges? This paper features a case study of the implementation of digital badges in the non-compulsory coursework within a PhD program at the Australian National University. It was expected that learners would experience the digital badges as motivators for learning and participation, based on an analysis of the existing literature, but the evaluation - which consisted of survey and focus group data as well as observations of interactions on social media platforms – showed that badges did not perform the roles expected. This failure case is used to develop a theory of badge desirability, using tools and concepts from actor network theory. Analysis of this case shows us the degree of complexity around how digital badges come to have symbolic value (or not). It was shown that what makes a badge desirable or not to a learner is complex and we should not assume that learners will always see badges in the same way. This paper will help practitioners and technologists think about the design of badge systems and will add nuance to the current discussions about when and where to use badges for educational purposes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Inger Mewburn, Australian National University

Inger Mewburn is the director of research training at the Australian National University and the managing editor of the Thesis Whisperer blog. She has an interest in educational technology and research student experience.

References

Ahn, J., Pellicone, A., & Butler, B. S. (2014). Open badges for education: what are the implications at the intersection of open systems and badging?. Research in Learning Technology, 22.

Barnacle, R., & Mewburn, I. (2010). Learning networks and the journey of ‘becoming doctor’. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 433-444.

Carlson, S., & Blumenstyk, G. (2012). For whom is college being reinvented?. Chronicle of Higher Education, 17.

Cuthbert, D., & Spencer, C. (2001). White lies, damned lies and annual progress reports of HDR candidates and their supervisors. Australian Association of Institutional Researchers (AAIR) Forum 2001: Proceedings: University of Central Queensland. Retrieved December 5, 2011, from http://www.aair.org.au/jir/html/Papers2001.htm

Devedžić, V., & Jovanović, J. (2015). Developing open badges: a comprehensive approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(4), 603-620.

Gibson, D., Ostashewski, N., Flintoff, K., Grant, S., & Knight, E. (2015). Digital badges in education. Education and Information Technologies, 20(2), 403-410.

Glover, I. (2013). Open badges: A visual method of recognising achievement and increasing learner motivation. Student Engagement and Experience Journal, 2(1).

GLOVER, Ian and LATIF, Farzana (2013). Investigating perceptions and potential of open badges in formal higher education. In: HERRINGTON, Jan, COUROS, Alec and IRVINE, Valerie, (eds.) Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2013. Chesapeake, VA, AACE, 1398-1402.

Halavais, A. M. (2012). A genealogy of badges: Inherited meaning and monstrous moral hybrids. Information, Communication & Society, 15(3), 354-373.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford university press, Oxford.

Law, J. (2009). Seeing like a survey. Cultural sociology, 3(2), 239-256.

Lovitts, B. E. (2007). Making the implicit explicit: Creating performance expectations for the dissertation. Stylus Publishing, Sterling, Virginia.

Mewburn, I., Freund, K., & Rutherford, E. (2014). Badge trouble: piloting open badges at the Australian National University (pp. 643–647). Presented at the Ascilite 2014: Rhetoric and Reality, Dunedin.

Mewburn, I., Tokareva, E., Cuthbert, D., Sinclair, J., & Barnacle, R. (2014). ‘These are issues that should not be raised in black and white’: the culture of progress reporting and the doctorate. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(3), 510-522.

Mills, G. E. (2000). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Prentice-Hall, Inc., One Lake Street, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

Müller, M. (2015). Assemblages and Actor-networks: Rethinking Socio-material Power, Politics and Space. Geography Compass, 9(1), 27–41.

Pittinsky, M. (2015). Credentialing in Higher Education: Current Challenges and Innovative Trends, EDUCAUSE Review, 50(2), 1-5

Rutherford, E., Freund, K., Jenks, H, & Mewburn, I. (2015) Badging the library: are digital badges the next innovation for library skills and training? ALIA InfoOnline 2015, Sydney.

Sharples, M., McAndrew, P., Weller, M., Ferguson, R., FitzGerald, E., Hirst, T., Mor, Y., Gaved, M. and Whitelock, D. (2012). Innovating Pedagogy 2012: Open University Innovation Report 1. Milton Keynes: The Open University.

Suchman, L. (1995). Making work visible. Communications of the ACM, 38(9), 56–64

Willis III, J. E., Quick, J. D., & Hickey, D. T. (2015). Digital Badges and Ethics: The Uses of Individual Learning Data in Social Contexts, OBIE@ LAK, 41-45.

SEHEJ Volume 1 | Issue 2 | September 2017

Downloads

Published

2017-11-11

How to Cite

Mewburn, I. (2017). A PhD should not look like it’s fun: an actor network theory analysis of digital badges. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 1(2), 40. Retrieved from https://sehej.raise-network.com/raise/article/view/mewburn

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2017)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a.  Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b.  Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

c.  Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).