Police, politics and democratic learning communities in Higher Education

  • Tom Lunt London Metropolitan University

Abstract

This paper suggests a different way of theorising the concept of learning community as it relates to digital literacy, social capital and student engagement in Higher Education. Drawing on the work of Quinn (2005) and Rancière (1991, 2010) to examine texts created by students and staff in interviews and in their VLE, the normative discourses of learning community and student engagement are problematized and the role of digital literacy in group work analysed. The paper suggests the term Democratic Learning Community (DLC) as an alternative to the normative and consensus driven discourses of learning community and student engagement prevalent in higher education. DLCs recognise the presence of political subjectification, dissent and resistance that will contribute insight to those involved in teaching students using digital platforms in Higher Education.

Author Biography

Tom Lunt, London Metropolitan University
Senior Lecturer

References

Belbin, R. M. (2010). Team roles at work (2nd ed). Amsterdam ; London: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Bingham, C., & Biesta, G. (2010). Jacques Rancière: Education, Truth, Emancipation. London: Continuum.

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of Capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.

Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1979). The Inheritors. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage.

Bryson, C. (Ed.). (2014). Understanding and Developing Student Engagement. Oxon: Routledge.

Coates, H. (2007). A model of online and general campus‐based student engagement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600801878

Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94.

Cresswell, J. (1998). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Second). Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage Publications.

Danvers, E. C., & Gagnon, J. (2014). Is “student engagement” just a mirage? The case for student activism. Student Engagement and Experience Journal, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.7190/seej.v3i2.89

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language (2nd ed.). Oxon: Routledge.

Hardy, C., & Bryson, C. (2016). The salience of social relationships and networks in enabling student engagement and success. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 1(1). Retrieved from https://journals.gre.ac.uk/index.php/raise/article/view/376

Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2015). What works and why? Student perceptions of “useful” digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 0(0), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946

Jisc. (2004). Effective Practice with e-Learning: A good practice guide in designing for learning. Retrieved from internal-pdf://effectivepracticedigitalage-1456525568/effectivepracticedigitalage.pdf

Jisc. (2009). Effective practice in a digital age. HEFCE. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/programmerelated/2009/effectivepracticedigitalage.aspx#downloads

Jisc. (2011). Transforming Curriculum Delivery through Technology Stories of challenge, benefit and change. HEFCE. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/elearning/curriculumdelivery/curriculumdeliveryguide.aspx

Jisc. (2012a). Developing Digital Literacies. Retrieved September 10, 2013, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/briefingpapers/2012/developing-digital-literacies.aspx

Jisc. (2012b). Learning in a Digital Age - extending higher education opportunities for lifelong learning. HEFCE. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/elearning/digilifelong.aspx

Kahn, P. E. (2014). Theorising student engagement in higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 40(6), 1005–1018. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3121

Kahu, E. R. (2011). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505

Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book (Second). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Pelletier, C. (2009). Emancipation, equality and education: Rancière’s critique of Bourdieu and the question of performativity. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 30(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300902809054

Pelletier, C. (2012). No time or place for universal teaching : The Ignorant Schoolmaster and contemporary work on pedagogy. In J.-P. Deranty & A. Ross (Eds.), Jacques Ranciere and the Contemporary Scene (pp. 99–115). Continuum. Retrieved from http://eprints.ioe.ac.uk/14509/

Purvis, A., Rodger, H., & Beckingham, S. (2016). Engagement or Distraction: The use of Social Media for Learning in Higher Education. Student Engagement and Experience Journal, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.7190/seej.v5i1.122

Putnam, R. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 67–87.

Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princetown: Princetown University Press.

Quinn, J. (2005). Belonging in a learning community: The re-imagined university and imagined social capital. Studies in the Education of Adults, 37(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/Article

Rancière, J. (1991). The Ignorant School Master: Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation. (K. Ross, Trans.). Stanford. CA.: Stanford University Press.

Rancière, J. (1999). Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis, MN/London: University of Minnesota Press.

Ranciere, J. (2010). On Ignorant School Masters. In Bingham, C & Biesta, G, Jacques Ranciere: Education, Truth, Emancipation. London: Continuum.

Stake, R. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks. Cal.: Sage.

Tinto, V. (1997). Classrooms as Communities: Exploring the Educational Character of Student Persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 68(6), 599–623.

Tzanakis, M. (2013). Social capital in Bourdieu’s, Coleman’s and Putnam’s theory: empirical evidence and emergent measurement issues. Educate, 13(2), 2–23.

Wenger, E. (2010). Communities of practice and social learning systems: the career of a concept. In Social Learning Systems and communities of practice. Springer Verlag and the Open University. Retrieved from internal-pdf://11-04-Wenger_Trayner_DeLaat_Value_creation-2853745418/11-04-Wenger_Trayner_DeLaat_Value_creation.pdf

Wintrup, J. (2014). Engagement as dynamic and relational: Students’ accounts and achievements over time. In C. Bryson (Ed.), Understanding and Developing Student Engagement. Oxon: Routledge.

Zyngier, D. (2008). (Re)conceptualising student engagement: Doing education not doing time. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1765–1776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.09.004

Published
2017-11-11
How to Cite
Lunt, T. (2017). Police, politics and democratic learning communities in Higher Education. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 1(2), 16. Retrieved from https://sehej.raise-network.com/raise/article/view/lunt
Section
Articles