What helps students to engage with the academic environment?
This paper brings together concerns about student engagement and widening participation in higher education, to explore what helps students to engage with the academic environment at a research intensive university in England. It is based on a joint research project between the University and Students’ Union, which explored students’ experiences of, and perceptions about, their engagement with the academic environment. We aimed to get beyond the idea of student ‘apathy’ to get a deeper understanding of why students do or do not participate in particular activities, and to identify potential barriers to engagement. Instead of defining student engagement, we tried to find out how students themselves understood the term.
We interviewed a diverse sample of students about their life at University and their perception of their engagement with the academic environment, their interactions with other students and staff, their sense of community, and their interaction with the Students’ Union and student representation structures. We analysed the data using a qualitative thematic approach.
Drawing on the interview data, this paper highlights potential barriers to engagement and factors that facilitate engagement, and examines how these interact with students’ backgrounds and lives beyond the University. It considers how we can enable student engagement in the academic environment, through considering themes such as community building, learning and teaching, student support, and student social life. Importantly, it reflects on how to ensure that student engagement opportunities are inclusive.
Bai, Y., & Chang, T.-S. (2016). Effects of class size and attendance policy on university classroom interaction in Taiwan. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(3), 316-328.
Barnett, B., & Felten, P. (2016). Intersectionality in Action: A Guide for Faculty and Campus Leaders for Creating Inclusive Classrooms and Institutions. Stylus Publishing.
Bligh, D. A. (1998). What's the Use of Lectures? Intellect books.
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71(2), 195-208.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Chan, V. (2001). Learning autonomously: The learners' perspectives. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25(3), 285-300.
Crosling, G., Heagney, M., & Thomas, L. (2009). Improving student retention in higher education: Improving teaching and learning. The Australian Universities' Review, 51(2), 9.
Crozier, G., & Reay, D. (2011). Capital accumulation: working-class students learning how to learn in HE. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(2), 145-155.
Davies, C., & Garrett, M. (2013). The BME student experience at a small northern university: an examination of the experiences of minority ethnic students undertaking undergraduate study within a small northern university. Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching, 3(5).
Department for Education (2016). Educational Excellence Everywhere. London: HMSO.
Department for Education (2017). Participation Rates in Higher Education: Academic Years 2006/2007 – 2015/2016. Report No. SFR47/2017.
Gupta, A., & Saks, N. S. (2013). Exploring medical student decisions regarding attending live lectures and using recorded lectures. Medical Teacher, 35(9), 767-771.
Haggis, T. (2006). Pedagogies for diversity: Retaining critical challenge amidst fears of ‘dumbing down’. Studies in Higher Education, 31(5), 521-535.
Harfitt, G. J., & Tsui, A. B. (2015). An examination of class size reduction on teaching and learning processes: A theoretical perspective. British Educational Research Journal, 41(5), 845-865.
Heagney, M., & Benson, R. (2017). How mature-age students succeed in higher education: implications for institutional support. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(3), 216-234.
HEFCE. (2011). National Student Survey: Findings and trends 2006 to 2010. London: HEFCE.
Hewitt, L., & Rose-Adams, J. (2013). What 'retention' means to me: The position of the adult learner in student retention. Widening participation and lifelong learning, 14(1), 146-164.
Kane, S., Chalcraft, D., & Volpe, G. (2014). Notions of belonging: First year, first semester higher education students enrolled on business or economics degree programmes. The International Journal of Management Education, 12(2), 193-201.
Li, L., Liu, X., & Steckelberg, A. L. (2010). Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British journal of educational technology, 41(3), 525-536.
Matthews, K. E., Groenendijk, L. J., & Chunduri, P. (2017). We Want to be More Involved: Student Perceptions of Students as Partners Across the Degree Program Curriculum. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2).
McMahon, P. (2011). Chinese voices: Chinese learners and their experiences of living and studying in the United Kingdom. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(4), 401-414.
Meeuwisse, M., Severiens, S. E., & Born, M. P. (2010). Learning environment, interaction, sense of belonging and study success in ethnically diverse student groups. Research in Higher Education, 51(6), 528-545.
National Union of Students. (2008). NUS student experience report. Retrieved from https://www.nus.org.uk/PageFiles/4017/NUS_StudentExperienceReport.pdf.
National Union of Students. (2011). Race for equality: A report on the experiences of black students in further and higher education. Retrieved from https://www.nus.org.uk/PageFiles/12350/NUS_Race_for_Equality_web.pdf
O'Keeffe, P. (2013). A sense of belonging: Improving student retention. College Student Journal, 47(4), 605-613.
Piper, R. (2006). Enhancing the student experience in Scotland: The work of the QAA Quality Enhancement Theme. Paper presented at the meeting of the Higher Education Academy, in Edinburgh.
Read, B., Archer, L., & Leathwood, C. (2003). Challenging cultures? Student conceptions of 'belonging' and 'isolation' at a post-1992 university. Studies in Higher Education, 28(3), 261-277.
Reay, D., Crozier, G., & Clayton, J. (2010). ‘Fitting in’ or ‘standing out’: Working‐class students in UK higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 36(1), 107-124.
Roberts, S. (2011). Traditional practice for non‐traditional students? Examining the role of pedagogy in higher education retention. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 35(2), 183-199.
Schartner, A. (2015). ‘You cannot talk with all of the strangers in a pub’: a longitudinal case study of international postgraduate students’ social ties at a British university. Higher Education, 69(2), 225-241.
Stevenson, J., & Whelan, P. (2013). Synthesis of US literature relating to the retention, progression, completion and attainment of black and minority ethnic (BME) students in HE. York: Higher Education Academy.
Thomas, E. (2012). Building student engagement and belonging in Higher Education at a time of change: final report from the What Works? Student Retention & Success programme. Higher Education Academy.
Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The higher education academy, 11(1), 1-15.
Vinson, D., Nixon, S., Walsh, B., Walker, C., Mitchell, E., & Zaitseva, E. (2010). Investigating the relationship between student engagement and transition. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(2), 131-143.
Watts, C., & Pickering, A. (2000). Pay as you learn: student employment and academic progress. Education and Training, 42(3), 129-135.
Wichadee, S. (2010). Using wikis to develop summary writing abilities of students in an EFL class. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 7(12), 5-10.
Yorke, M., & Thomas, L. (2003). Improving the retention of students from lower socio-economic groups. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 25(1), 63-74.
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).