Freeing the hoop jumpers: Eportfolio assessment to raise learner engagement on PgCert HE programmes
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman.
Asghar, M. (2014). Using e-portfolios to evidence the UKPSF. SEDA Educational Developments, 15(4), 22-26.
Bell, M. (2001). Supported reflective practice: a programme of peer observation and feedback for academic teaching development. International Journal for Academic Development, 6(1), 29-39.
Biggs, J. & Tang. C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Maidenhead: SRHE and Open University Press.
Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York, NY: David McKay Co Inc.
Browne, J. (2010). Securing a sustainable future for higher education; An independent review of Higher Education Funding and Student Finance. (Report) Retrieved from Independent.gov.uk: https://www.gov.uk/file/422565/bis-10-1208-securing-sustainable-higher-education-browne-report.pdf
Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in University Assessment. London: Routledge.
Davies, V. & Maguire, S. (2013). Institutional Factors in re-designing an accredited continuing professional development course in Northern Ireland. In E. Simon & G. Pleschova (Eds.) Teacher Development in Higher Education: Existing Programs, Program Impact and Future Trends. New York, NY & London: Routledge.
Dearing, R. (1997). Higher Education in the Learning Society: The National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education. (Report). London: HMSO.
Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2003). The future of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.msmt.cz/uploads/bila_kniha/DfES_HigherEducation.pdf
Gale, H. (2011). ‘To defer or not to defer’ why it may not be the question. Educational Developments, 12(1), 24- 26.
Gosling, D. (2010). Professional development for new staff – how mandatory is Your Post Graduate Certificate? Educational Development, 11(2), London: SEDA. Retrieved from http://www.seda.ac.uk/publications_119_EducationalDevelopments%2011.2.v2.pdf
Higher Education Authority (HEA) (2011). Inclusive Curriculum Design in Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/Inclusive_curriculum_design_in_higher_education
Hughes, G. (2014). Ipsative Assessment. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Laycock, M. & Shrives, L. (2009). Embedding CPD in Higher Education. (SEDA Paper 123). London: SEDA.
Hyland, K. (2003) Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lorenzo, G. & Ittelson, J. (2005). An overview of E-Portfolios. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3001.pdf
Parker, M., Ndoye, A., & Ritzhapt, A. (2012). Qualitative analysis of student perceptions of e-portfolios in a teacher education program. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(3), 99-107.
Rust, C. (2007). Assessment Issues. Issues paper for the PASS Project. Retrieved from http://www.pass.brad.ac.uk/resources.php
Shrives, L. (2012). From Postgraduate Certificates…To embedding UKPSF at all levels. Educational Developments, 13(3), 1-6.
Stone, P. (2011). Please do not defer….A personal reflection of participation on the PGCLT (HE). Educational Developments, 12(3), 16-18.
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).