Case study: Engaging Students, Elevating Voices: The Role of a Student Council in Education
Keywords:
Student Engagement, Student Council, Co-creation, Inclusive Practice, Leadership Development, Curriculum DesignAbstract
In the evolving landscape of higher education, student engagement is critical for academic success. This case study examines a strategic initiative within a United Kingdom (UK) university’s nursing programme to enhance student voice through a student council, fostering authentic co-production amid post-pandemic challenges and financial pressures. The council, with diverse representatives, shifted from traditional feedback methods like surveys to co-creation, engaging students in curriculum design, teaching methods, and assessment strategies via anonymous surveys and regular meetings. It addressed inclusivity for less vocal or non-traditional students, balanced student-staff expectations, and tackled challenges like sustaining engagement through hybrid models and transparent communication. Outcomes included increased student satisfaction, stronger tutor-student relationships, and enhanced leadership skills through peer mentoring and council-led events. This initiative offers a replicable model for other disciplines seeking inclusive, student-centred academic environments.
Downloads
References
Acosta-Gonzaga, E. (2023). The effects of self-esteem and academic engagement on university students’ performance. Behavioral Sciences, 13(4), Article 348. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13040348
Alderson, P. (2000). School students’ views on school councils and daily life at school. Children & Society, 14(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2000.tb00160.x
Balalle, H. (2024). Exploring student engagement in technology-based education in relation to gamification, online/distance learning, and other factors: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, Article 100870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100870
Bloch, R., O’Connell, C., Hartl, J., & O’Siochru, C. (2021). English and German academics’ perspectives on metrics in higher education: Evaluating dimensions of fairness and organisational justice. Higher Education, 82(4), 765–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00671-7
Bols, A. T. G. (2017). Enhancing student representation. The Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change, 3(1), 81–89. https://journals.studentengagement.org.uk/index.php/studentchangeagents/article/view/585
Buckley, P., & Lee, P. (2021). The impact of extra-curricular activity on the student experience. Active Learning in Higher Education, 22(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418808988
Civic University Network. (2024). Enhancing the student civic experience. https://civicuniversitynetwork.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Enhancing-the-Student-Civic-Experience-report.pdf
Conner, J., Posner, M., & Nsowaa, B. (2022). The relationship between student voice and student engagement in urban high schools. The Urban Review, 54(5), 755–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-022-00637-2
Crabtree, R. (2023). Barriers to student engagement: Why don’t university students engage? Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 4(3), 28–47. https://sehej.raise-network.com/raise/article/view/1156
Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021). An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, Article 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3
Holdsworth, R. (2021). Give me a place to stand and I’ll move the earth: Some reflections on 42 years of publishing Connect. Connect, 250, 6–10.
Lu, C., & Cutumisu, M. (2022). Online engagement and performance on formative assessments mediate the relationship between attendance and course performance. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00307-5
Lucander, H., & Christersson, C. (2020). Engagement for quality development in higher education: A process for quality assurance of assessment. Quality in Higher Education, 26(2), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2020.1761008
Matthews, K. E., & Dollinger, M. (2023). Student voice in higher education: The importance of distinguishing student representation and student partnership. Higher Education, 85(3), 555–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00851-7
Mebert, L., Barnes, R., Dalley, J., Gawarecki, L., Ghazi-Nezami, F., Shafer, G., Slater, J., & Yezbick, E. (2020). Fostering student engagement through a real-world, collaborative project across disciplines and institutions. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1750306
Messiou, K., de los Reyes, J., Potnis, C., Dong, P., & Rwang, V. K. (2024). Student voice for promoting inclusion in primary schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 29(7), 1168–1182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2024.2317729
National Union of Students. (2023). Student leadership and representation in higher education. https://www.nus.org.uk/leadership
Pitt, E., & Quinlan, K. M. (2021). Impacts of higher education assessment and feedback policy and practice on students: A review of the literature 2016–2021. Advance HE. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/impacts-higher-education-assessment-and-feedback-policy-and-practice-students-review
Trolian, T. L. (2024). Student engagement in higher education: Conceptualizations, measurement, and research. In L. W. Perna (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 39, pp. 1–47). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38077-8_6
Whitty, G., & Wisby, E. (2007). Whose voice? An exploration of the current policy interest in pupil involvement in school decision-making. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 17(3), 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620210701543957
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).