Barriers to Student Engagement: Why Don't University Students Engage?
Student engagement (SE) is considered a ‘hot topic’ in many universities and extensive resources are placed on strategies to encourage students to participate in both academic and non-academic activities. However, many initiatives do not produce the intended aims, resulting in wasteful policies that do not enhance the student experience. Understanding the barriers that prevent students from participating in engagement is fundamental to ensure resources are used effectively for the benefit of all students.
This study investigates engagement within higher education (HE) focusing on student opinions beyond academic activities. Focus groups were undertaken (n=21) to investigate the role of students with regards SE and barriers that stopped students from engagement within HE.
Results revealed that students agreed they have a role in engagement including responsibility to be pro-active and help co-create. The barriers to engagement were many including: transitioning; financial; cultural issues; and staff buy-in. Management implications suggested the need for senior leadership involvement with SE and a greater understanding of the student population.
Aljohani, O. (2016). A Comprehensive Review of the Major Studies and Theoretical Models of Student Retention in Higher Education. Higher Education Studies. 6(2), 1-18.
Andrade, M. & Alden-Rivers, B. (2019). Developing a Framework for Sustainable Growth of Flexible Learning Opportunities. Higher Education Pedagogies. 4(1), 1-16.
Augar, P. (2019). Review of Post-18 Education and Funding. Independent Panel Report to HM Government. APS, London.
Beer, C. & Lawson, C. (2018). Framing Attrition in Higher Education: A Complex Problem. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 42(4), 497-508.
Bolton, P. (2020). Higher Education Student Numbers. House of Commons Briefing Paper. Number 7857. London.
Boylan, R. & Renzulli, L. (2017). Routes and Reasons Out, Paths Back: The Influence of Push and Pull Reasons for Students’ School Reengagement. Youth & Society. 49(1), 46-71.
Buckley, A. (2013). Engagement for Enhancement. Report of a UK Survey Pilot. A Report for the Higher Education Academy, York.
Carey, M. & Asbury, J. (2016). Focus Group Research. Routledge, London.
Castello, M., Pardo, M., Sala-Bubare, A. & Sune-Soler, N. (2017). Why Do Students Consider Dropping out of Doctoral Degrees? Institutional and Personal Factors. Higher Education. 74, 1053-1068.
Castro, P., Woodin, J., Lundgren, U. & Byram, M. (2016). Student Mobility and Internationalisation in Higher Education: Perspectives from Practitioners. Language and Intercultural Communication. 16(3) 418-436.
Cattaneo, M., Civera, A., Meoli, M. & Paleari, S. (2020). Analysing policies to increase graduate population: do tuition fees matter? European Journal of Higher Education. 10(1), 10-27.
Cena, E., Burns, S., & Wilson, P. (2021). Sense of Belonging and the Intercultural and Academic Experiences Among International Students at a University in Northern Ireland. Journal of International Students. 11(4), 812-831.
Collaco, C. (2017). Increasing Student Engagement in Higher Education. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice. 17(4), 40-47.
Collie, R., Martin, A., Botrell, D., Armstrong, D., Ungar, M. & Libenberg, L. (2017). Social Support, Academic Adversity and Academic Buoyancy: A Person-Centred Analysis and Implications for Academic Outcomes. Education Psychology. 37(5), 550-564.
Coertjens, L., Donche, V., De Mayer, S., Van Daal, T., & Van Petegem, P. (2017). The Growth Trend in Learning Strategies During the Transition from Secondary to Higher Education in Flanders. Higher Education. 73, 499-518.
Cotton, D., Nash, T., & Kneale, P. (2017). Supporting the Retention of Non-Traditional Students in Higher Education Using a Resilience Framework. European Educational Research Journal. 16 (1) 62-79.
Crabtree, R.M., Briggs, P., & Woratschek, H. (2021). Student Engagement and Barriers to Implementation. The View of Professional and Academic Staff. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education. 25(4), 144-150.
Cyr, J. (2016). The Pitfalls and Promise of Focus Groups as a Data Collection Method. Sociological Methods & Research. 45(2), 231-259.
De Wit, H. & Altbach, P. (2021). Internationalization in Higher Education: Global Trends and Recommendations for its Future. Policy Reviews in Higher Education. 5(1), 28-46.
Di Nauta, P., Merola, B., Caputo, F. & Evangelista, F. (2018). Reflections on the Role of University to Face the Challenges of Knowledge Society for the Local Economic Development. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 8(9), 180-198.
Dollinger, M., Lodge, J. & Coates, H. (2018). Co-creation in Higher Education: Towards a Conceptual Model. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. 28(2), 210-231.
Dryer, R., Henning, M., Tyson, G. & Shaw, R. (2016). Academic Achievement Performance of University Students with Disability: Exploring the Influence of Non-Academic Factors. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education. 63(4), 419-430.
Du, J. & Lapsley, I. (2019). The Reform of UK Universities: A Management Dream, An Academic Nightmare? ABACUS, 55(3) 452-482.
Egalite, A., Kisida, B. & Winters, M. (2015). Representation in the Classroom: The Effect of Own-Race Teachers on Student Achievement. Economics of Education Review. 45, 44-52.
Ellis, H. (2019). A Non-traditional Conundrum: The Dilemma of Non-traditional Student Attrition in Higher Education. College Student Journal. 53(1), 24-32.
Eriksson, T., Adawi, T., & Stohr, C. (2017). Time is the Bottleneck: A Qualitative Study Exploring Why Learners Drop Out of MOOCs. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 29, 133-146.
Freeman, J. & Simonsen, B. (2015). Examining the Impact of Policy and Practice Interventions on High School Dropout and School Completion Rates: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Review of Educational Research. 85(2), 205-248.
Gourlay, L. (2015). Student Engagement and the Tyranny of Participation in Teaching. Higher Education. 20(4), 402-411.
Gray, J. & Di Loreto, M. (2016). The Effects of Student Engagement, Student Satisfaction, and Perceived Learning in Online Learning Environments. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation. 11(1), 1-20.
Griffin, K. & Gilbert, C. (2016). Better Transitions for Troops: An Application of Schlossberg’s Transition Framework to Analyses of Barriers and Institutional Support Structures for Student Veterans. The Journal of Higher Education. 86(1), 71-97.
Hamilton Bailey, T. & Phillips, L. (2016). The Influence of Motivation and Adaptation on Students’ Subjective Well-being, Meaning in Life and Academic Performance. Higher Education Research & Development. 35(2), 201-216.
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2016). Students as Partners: Reflections on a Conceptual Model. Open Access Journal. Accessed September, 2019 at https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1148481.pdf
Hensley, B., Galilee-Belfer & Lee (2013). What is the Greater Good? The Discourse on Public and Private Roles of Higher Education in the New Economy. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 35(5), pp.553-567.
HM Government (2019). International Education Strategy Global Potential, Global Growth. Accessed March, 2020 at www.gov.uk/education.
Holliman, A., Sheriston, L., Martin, A., Collie, R. & Sayer, D. (2018). Adaptability: Does Students Adjustment to University Predict their Mid-Course Academic Achievement and Satisfaction? Journal of Further and Higher Education. Open Access Journal. Accessed November, 2019 at https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1491957.
Ishitani, T. (2016). Time-Varying Effects of Academic and Social Integration on Student Persistence for First and Second Years in College: National Data Approach. Journal of College Student Retention, Theory & Practice. 18(3), 263-286.
Jahn, V., Heise, L., Schneider, A. & Gunther, S. (2017). Different Students – Different Ways: Challenges of Integrating Non-Traditional Students in Higher Education and How Electronic Learning Can Support Inclusion. In Zaphiris, P. & Ioannou, A. (Eds) Learning and Collaboration Technologies, Technology in Education. Springer, Vancouver.
Jang, H., Kim, E. & Reeve, J. (2016). Why Students Become More Engaged or More Disengaged During the Semester: A Self-Determination Theory Dual Process Model. Learning and Instruction. 43, 27-38.
Jones, C., Newsome, J., Levin, K., Wilmot, A., McNulty, J. & Kline, T. (2018). Friends or Strangers? A Feasibility Study of an Innovative Focus Group Methodology. The Qualitative Report. 23(1), 98-112.
Kahu, E. & Nelson, K. (2018). Student Engagement in the Educational Interface: Understanding the Mechanisms of Student Success. Higher Education Research & Development. 37(1), 58-71.
Labanauskis, R. & Ginevicius, R. (2017). Role of Stakeholders Leading to Development of Higher Education Services. Engineering Management in Production and Services. 9(3) 63-75.
Money, J., Tracy, F., Hennessy, C., Nixon, S. & Ball, E. (2016) Student Expectations: What is University Really About? Innovations in Practice. 10(2), 82-87.
Orcher, L. (2017). Conducting Research. Social and Behavioural Science Methods (Second Edition). Routledge.
Padgett, D. (2017). Qualitative Methods in Social Work Research (Third Edition). Sage.
Payne, L. (2019). Student Engagement: Three Models for its Investigation. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 43(5), 641-657.
Quin, D. (2017). Longitudinal and Contextual Associations Between Teacher–Student Relationships and Student Engagement: A Systematic Review. Review of Educational Research. 87(2), 345-387.
Rothwell, E., Anderson, R. & Botkin, J. (2016). Deliberative Discussion Focus Groups. Qualitative Health Research. 26(6), 734-740.
Saldana, J. (2016). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (Third Edition). Sage.
Shah, M. & Cheng, M. (2019). Exploring Factors Impacting Student Engagement in Open Access Courses. The Journal of Open, Distance and eLearning. 34(2), 187-202.
Sim, J. & Waterfield, J. (2019). Focus Group Methodology: Some Ethical Challenges. Quality and Quantity. 53, 3003-3022.
Stoessel, K., Ihme, T., Barbarino, M., Fisseler, B. & Sturmer, S. (2015). Sociodemographic Diversity and Distance Education: Who Drops out from Academic Programs and Why? Research Higher Education. 56, 228-246.
Swartz, R., Ivancheva, M., Czerniewicz, L. & Morris, N. (2019). Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Dilemmas Regarding the Purpose of Public Universities in South Africa. Higher Education. 77, 567-583.
Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Bearman, M. & Wiseman, P. (2020). Conceptualizations and Measures of Student Engagement: A Worked Example of Systematic Review. In Zawacki-Richter, O., Kerres, M., Bedenlier, S., Bond, M. & Buntins, K. (eds) Systematic Reviews in Educational Research. Springer VS.
Tight, M. (2020). Student Retention and Engagement in Higher Education, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(5), 689-704.
Wainwright, E., Chappell, A. & McHugh, E. (2020). Widening Participation and a Student “Success” Assemblage: The Materialities and Mobilities of University. Population, Space and Place. Open Access Journal. Accessed June, 2020 at https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2291
Whannell, R. & Whannell, P. (2015). Identity Theory as a Theoretical Framework to Understand Attrition for University Students in Transition. Student Success. 6(2) 43-52.
How to Cite
LicenseAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).