Collaborative Learning and Student Engagement in Higher Education: A Systematic Scoping Review and Evidence-Gap Map
Keywords:
Collaborative Learning, Student Engagement, Higher Education, Systematic Scoping ReviewAbstract
Collaborative learning has emerged as a fundamental pedagogical approach in higher education to achieve shared learning objectives. This systematic scoping review provides a comprehensive overview of the empirical research on collaborative learning and student engagement in higher education. The review explored various concepts, stakeholders, and contexts involved in collaborative learning processes, along with the dimensions of student engagement examined in the literature. Based on a comprehensive literature search of relevant peer-reviewed articles in three databases, 485 studies were selected as eligible in line with the a priori defined criteria. The analysis revealed a growing body of research on collaborative learning, with most studies focusing on general collaboration among students, while specific forms such as co-creation, co-production, and co-design were less frequently addressed. The majority of the studies examined collaboration between students, but few included other stakeholders like industry partners. Additionally, much of the research lacks assessment of various dimensions of student engagement. In line with the significant gaps identified in the literature, this review underscores the need for future research to develop standardized measures of student engagement, include diverse stakeholders in studies on collaboration, and explore different types of collaborative learning. Addressing these gaps can enhance our understanding of how collaborative learning is related to student engagement and inform effective educational practices in higher education.
Downloads
References
Allan, D. (2022). Lesson Study and Teacher Training: Engaging in the Co-construction of Pedagogical Knowledge. In Innovative Approaches in Pedagogy for Higher Education Classrooms (pp. 41-53). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Bandola-Gill, J., Arthur, M., & Leng, R. I. (2023). What is co-production? Conceptualising and understanding co-production of knowledge and policy across different theoretical perspectives. Evidence & Policy, 19(2), 275-298. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421X16420955772641
Barnes, M., Lafferty, K., & Li, B. (2024). Assessing twenty-first century competencies: can students lead and facilitate the co-construction process? Educational Review, 76(4), 691-709. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2022.2142524
Bharucha, J. P. (2017). Building Student engagement through collaborative practice in business management education. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments(IJVPLE), 7(2), 1-12. DOI: 10.4018/IJVPLE.2017070101
Bjørnerås, A. B., Langørgen, E., Witsø, A. E., Kvam, L., Nolan, C., Leithaug, A.-E., & Horghagen, S. (2024). Processes Empowering Disabled Students in the Co-Production of Inclusive Higher Education. Social Sciences, 13(7), 345. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13070345
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Buntins, K., Kerres, M., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2020). Facilitating student engagement in higher education through educational technology: A narrative systematic review in the field of education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 20(2), 315-368. Retrieved April 21, 2025 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/208718/.
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 17(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103819
Bovill, C. (2020). Co-creation in learning and teaching: the case for a whole-class approach in higher education. Higher education, 79(6), 1023-1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00453-w
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71, 195-208. DOI 10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4
Bovill, C., & Woolmer, C. (2019). How conceptualisations of curriculum in higher education influence student-staff co-creation in and of the curriculum. Higher Education, 78(3), 407-422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0349-8
Bowden, J. L. H., Tickle, L., & Naumann, K. (2021). The four pillars of tertiary student engagement and success: a holistic measurement approach. Studies in Higher Education, 46(6), 1207-1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1672647
Carvalho, S. W., & de Oliveira Mota, M. (2010). The role of trust in creating value and student loyalty in relational exchanges between higher education institutions and their students. Journal of marketing for higher education, 20(1), 145-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241003788201
Cavallone, M., Ciasullo, M. V., Douglas, J., & Palumbo, R. (2021). Framing higher education quality from a business perspective: setting the conditions for value co-creation. Studies in higher education, 46(6), 1099-1111. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1672644
Chakraborty, A., Singh, M. P., & Roy, M. (2019). Engaging stakeholders in the process of sustainability integration in higher education institutions: a systematic review. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 22(3-4), 186-220. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2019.105330
Coates, H. (2010). Development of the Australasian survey of student engagement Digital Solution Foundry, & EPPI-Centre. (2020). EPPI-Mapper (Version 1.2.5) [Computer software]. UCL Social Research Institute.
Dollinger, M., Liu, D., Arthars, N., & Lodge, J. M. (2019). Working together in learning analytics towards the co-creation of value. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2), 10-26. 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.62.2
Dollinger, M., & Lodge, J. (2020). Student-staff co-creation in higher education: An evidence-informed model to support future design and implementation. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 42(5), 532-546. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2019.1663681
Dollinger, M., Lodge, J., & Coates, H. (2018). Co-creation in higher education: Towards a conceptual model. Journal of marketing for higher education, 28(2), 210-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2018.1466756
Eccles, J. S. (2016). Engagement: Where to next? Learning and instruction, 43, 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.003
Elsharnouby, T. H. (2015). Student co-creation behavior in higher education: The role of satisfaction with the university experience. Journal of marketing for higher education, 25(2), 238-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2015.1059919
Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97-131). Springer.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307400
Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. In (Vol. 43, pp. 1-4): Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002
Ha, L., & Pepin, J. (2017). Experiences of nursing students and educators during the co-construction of clinical nursing leadership learning activities: A qualitative research and development study. Nurse Education Today, 55, 90-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.05.006
Hendry, F., Mynott, J. P., Berube, I., & Smith, G. (2025). ‘What the university expects’: evaluating and co-constructing the teaching of assessment skills for first-year undergraduate students of education. Cogent education, 12(1), 2447557. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2447557
Iniesto, F., Charitonos, K., & Littlejohn, A. (2022). A review of research with co-design methods in health education. Open Education Studies, 4(1), 273-295. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2022-0017
Kettunen, J. (2015). Stakeholder relationships in higher education. Tertiary Education and Management, 21, 56-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2014.997277
Kumi-Yeboah, A., Kim, Y., Sallar, A. M., & Kiramba, L. K. (2020). Exploring the use of digital technologies from the perspective of diverse learners in online learning environments. Online Learning, 24(4), 42-63. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1277763
Kwong, R., & Kwok, M. L. J. (2025). Connecting the dots: the interplay between individual and environmental factors on learning engagement and student performance via goal orientation. Interactive Technology and Smart Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-11-2024-0290
Mattanah, J., Holt, L., Feinn, R., Bowley, O., Marszalek, K., Albert, E., Abduljalil, M., Daramola, D., Gim, J., & Visalli, T. (2024). Faculty-student rapport, student engagement, and approaches to collegiate learning: exploring a mediational model. Current Psychology, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06096-0
Mebert, L., Barnes, R., Dalley, J., Gawarecki, L., Ghazi-Nezami, F., Shafer, G., Slater, J., & Yezbick, E. (2020). Fostering student engagement through a real-world, collaborative project across disciplines and institutions. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 30-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1750306
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners. http://hdl.handle.net/10453/162694
Nkomo, L. M., Daniel, B. K., & Butson, R. J. (2021). Synthesis of student engagement with digital technologies: a systematic review of the literature. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 18, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00270-1
O'Connor, S., Zhang, M., Trout, K. K., & Snibsoer, A. K. (2021). Co-production in nursing and midwifery education: a systematic review of the literature. Nurse Education Today, 102, 104900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104900
Oliveira, T., Alves, H., & Leitão, J. (2024). Co-creation and innovation in higher education institutions: a systematic literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Educational Management, 38(3), 839-872. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-09-2023-0456
Osorno-Hinojosa, R., Koria, M., & del Carmen Ramírez-Vázquez, D. (2022). Open innovation with value co-creation from university–industry collaboration. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc801003
Page, M. J., Moher, D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2022). Introduction to PRISMA 2020 and implications for research synthesis methodologists. Research synthesis methods, 13(2), 156-163. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1535
Peters, M. D., Marnie, C., Tricco, A. C., Pollock, D., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., McInerney, P., Godfrey, C. M., & Khalil, H. (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI evidence synthesis, 18(10), 2119-2126. DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167
Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2023). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2371-2391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886
Redmond, P., Heffernan, A., Abawi, L., Brown, A., & Henderson, R. (2018). An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learning, 22(1), 183-204. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175
Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149-172). Springer.
Scager, K., Boonstra, J., Peeters, T., Vulperhorst, J., & Wiegant, F. (2016). Collaborative learning in higher education: Evoking positive interdependence. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), ar69. DOI:10.1187/cbe.16-07-0219
Smith, A., McConnell, L., Iyer, P., Allman-Farinelli, M., & Chen, J. (2025). Co-designing assessment tasks with students in tertiary education: a scoping review of the literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 50(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2376648
Smith, B., & Wyness, L. (2024). What makes professional teacher development in universities effective? Lessons from an international systematised review. Professional Development in Education, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2024.2386666
Stocker, F., de Arruda, M. P., de Mascena, K. M., & Boaventura, J. M. (2020). Stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: A classification model. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(5), 2071-2080. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1947
Subramainan, L., & Mahmoud, M. A. (2020). A systematic review on students’ engagement in classroom: Indicators, challenges and computational techniques. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(1), 105-115. DOI:10.14569/IJACSA.2020.0110113
Thomas, J., Graziosi, S., Brunton, J., Ghouze, Z., O’Driscoll, P., Bond, M., & Koryakina, A. (2020). EPPI-Reviewer: advanced software for systematic reviews, maps and evidence synthesis. EPPI-Centre Software. London: UCL Social Research Institute.
Towler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. Higher Education Academy.
Van Helden, G., Zandbergen, B. T., Specht, M. M., & Gill, E. K. (2023). Collaborative learning in engineering design education: A systematic literature review. ieee Transactions on Education, 66(5), 509-521. 10.1109/TE.2023.3283609
Vespone, B. (2023). Co-constructing teaching and learning in higher education: a literature review of practices and implications. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education(27). https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi27.997
Willox, A. C., Harper, S. L., Bridger, D., Morton, S., Orbach, A., & Sarapura, S. (2010). Co-Creating Metaphor in the Classroom for Deeper Learning: Graduate Student Reflections. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22(1), 71-79. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ913531
Wong, Z. Y., & Liem, G. A. D. (2022). Student engagement: Current state of the construct, conceptual refinement, and future research directions. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 107-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09628-3
Wong, Z. Y., Liem, G. A. D., Chan, M., & Datu, J. A. D. (2024). Student engagement and its association with academic achievement and subjective well-being: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000833
Xu, J., Lo, A., & Wu, J. (2018). Are students customers? Tourism and hospitality students’ evaluation of their higher education experience. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 18(3), 236-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2018.1463587
Zarandi, N., Soares, A., & Alves, H. (2024). Strategies, benefits and barriers–a systematic literature review of student co-creation in higher education. Journal of marketing for higher education, 34(2), 895-919. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2022.2134956
Zarandi, N., Soares, A., & Alves, H. (2022a). Strategies, benefits and barriers–a systematic literature review of student co-creation in higher education. Journal of marketing for higher education, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2022.2134956
Zarandi, N., Soares, A. M., & Alves, H. (2022b). Student roles and behaviors in higher education co-creation–a systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Management, 36(7), 1297-1320. https://www.emerald.com/insight/0951-354X.htm
Zeivots, S., Hopwood, N., Wardak, D., & Cram, A. (2025). Co-design practice in higher education: practice theory insights into collaborative curriculum development. Higher Education Research & Development, 44(3), 769-783. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2024.2410269
Zepke, N., & Leach, L. (2010). Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active learning in higher education, 11(3), 167-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/146978741037
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).