Fostering purposeful engagement by building staff-student communities


  • Chris Brignell University of Nottingham
  • Christina Brady University of Nottingham
  • Lisa Mott University of Nottingham
  • Tom Wicks University of Nottingham


In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, many universities moved to a blended delivery of online and in-person teaching.  While necessary for public health, this significant disruption to education risked greater isolation and anxiety for students with the potential for less engagement and, consequently, reduced confidence in their abilities.  However, it also presented an opportunity to re-evaluate practice and take steps to create new staff-student communities with potential to shape student engagement.

The School of Mathematical Sciences at the University of Nottingham took several approaches to preserve and enhance student engagement, such as induction processes to foster new online communities, initiatives to boost academic and social interaction, development of close partnerships between staff and students in shaping the pandemic response, and the creation of an online staff community to discuss pedagogic practice and share training resources.  The effectiveness of these approaches has been evaluated throughout the pandemic via staff-student meetings, module evaluation surveys and staff surveys.

More than half the cohort joined an online student forum showing students appreciated online social interaction.  However, for studying, students engaged in new one-to-one study-buddy and peer-mentoring schemes which students reported reduced their isolation and anxiety associated with online learning.  Students reported online discussion forums to be one of the most useful tools for online learning.  They liked being able to ask questions anonymously, in a forum where the lecturer was also present, something they could not do previously with in-person teaching.  However, many students reported difficulty with managing their time because of increased asynchronous learning activity indicating a need for students to be trained in how to engage with online studying.

Most staff have adopted elements of flipped learning to maximise student-student and student-staff interaction in the limited contact time.  Staff engagement in their online community was strong, with most staff attending workshops and training sessions regarding online teaching.  Consequently, staff were able to rapidly trial and share approaches that successfully addressed student feedback and promoted interaction.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Chris Brignell, University of Nottingham

Chris Brignell is Head of the Mathematical Education and Scholarship Section and an Associate Professor of Statistics.

Christina Brady, University of Nottingham

Christina Brady is the Student Experience Officer for the School of Mathematical Sciences and a Foundation Year Teacher.

Lisa Mott, University of Nottingham

Lisa Mott is the Digital Learning Lead for the School of Mathematical Sciences and Teaching Associate for apprenticeship programmes.

Tom Wicks, University of Nottingham

Tom Wicks is an Assistant Professor of Mathematics and is leading the School of Mathematical Sciences’ course review.


Ahn, M. Y., & Davis, H. H. (2020). Four domains of students' sense of belonging to university. Studies in Higher Education, 45(3): 622-634.

Crawford, J. K., Butler-Henderson, J., Rudolph, B., Malkawi, M., Glowatz, R., Burton, A., Magni, P., & Lam. S (2020). Covid-19: 20 countries' higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3 (1), 9-28.

Finnegan-Kessie, T., Donnellan, P., Oswald, T., & Vaugh. T. (2020). Socially distanced higher eduaction: Student and staff experiences of teaching and learning during the Covid-19 lockdown. All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 12(3).

Fisher, R., Perényi, Á, & Birdthistle, N. (2018). The positive relationship between flipped and blended learning and student engagement, performance and satisfaction. Active Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 97-113.

Ghannam, R., Hussain, S., & Abbasi, Q. (2020). Improving student engagement in a transnational engineering education programme using Piazza. UK & Ireland Engineering Education Research Network Annual Conference. Coventry: EERN.

Jong, B., Lai, C., Hsia, Y., &Lin. T. (2013). Effects of anonymity in group discussion on peer interaction and learning achievement. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(3), 292-299.

Kuh, G.D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683-706.

Lishchynska, M., & Palmer, C. (2021). Teaching maths in the time of COVID: The good, the bad and the missing factors. All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 13 1).

Mulrooney, H. M., & Kelly, A. F. (2020). Covid-19 and the move to online teaching: impact on perceptions of belonging in staff and students in a UK widening participation university. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3(2), 17-30.

Sankar, P., Gilmartin, J., & Sobel, M. (2015). An examination of belongingness and confidence among female computer science students. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 45(2), 7-10.

Thomas, L. (2012). What works? Student retention & success programme - Final report. London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation.

Tice, D., Baumeister, R., Crawford, J., Allen, K., & Percy, A. (2021). Student belongingness in higher education: Lessons for professors from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 18(4).

Tinto, V. (2006). Research and practice of student retention: What next? Journal of College and Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 8(1), 1-19.

Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The Higher Education Academy, 11(1), 1-15.




How to Cite

Brignell, C., Brady, C., Mott, L., & Wicks, T. (2022). Fostering purposeful engagement by building staff-student communities. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 4(2), 52–62. Retrieved from