Students and faculty perception of Active Learning: a case study
Keywords:Active learning, evaluation, perceptions, pharmacy
Active Learning (AL), a pedagogical approach during which students focus on application of knowledge rather than memorisation was integrated into a new undergraduate pharmacy curriculum in a UK University. This paper evaluates student and faculty perceptions of AL. First and second year students enrolled on the pharmacy course and faculty members were invited to respond to an online questionnaire covering three domains: value, effort and instructor contribution during AL sessions. Thirty-five students (58.3%) and 9 (60%) faculty members participated in the study. Nine AL sessions were provided. A difference in the perceived effectiveness of AL between students and faculty was identified mostly in two AL activities: patient as teacher (an expert patient talking about his/her condition to pharmacy students) and prescription review. Students and faculty confirmed the value of the AL activities with agreeing and strongly agree. Students confirmed they put effort into these activities and recognised the instructor contribution during the sessions. Overall, students and faculty had a positive perception of the AL sessions.
How to Cite
LicenseAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).