Leveraging creativity to engage students in an agile ecology for learning
This article explores the concept of an agile ecology for learning and its potential in leveraging creativity to engage students. Creativity is both seen as something that students bring with them from different part of their lives, across different formal and informal learning environments, but it is also seen as something that can be encouraged and developed through deliberate design of learning experiences and environments. The agile ecology for learning is fundamentally about blurring boundaries between informal and formal learning environments. A case study of a Closed Facebook group managed by students is used as a case study to illustrate the potential of using an agile ecology for learning as the underlying ‘map’ for learning design. If done well, we argue that this allows us to leverage creativity in students as both a tool of engagement and a crucial component in the development of a way of being for students whereby using their creativity in critically reflective ways becomes the norm.
Barnett, R. (1999). Realising the university in an age of supercomplexity. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
Barnett, R. (2000a). Supercomplexity and the curriculum. Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), 255-265.
Barnett, R. (2000b). University knowledge in an age of supercomplexity. HIgher Education, 40(4), 409-422.
Barnett, R. (2004). Learning in an unknown future. Higher Education Research and Development, 23(3), 247-260.
Barnett, R. (2013). Imagining the university. Oxon: Routledge.
Barnett, R. (2017). Foreword. In M. Y. C. A. Kek & H. Huijser (Eds.), Problem-based learning into the future: Imagining an agile PBL ecology for learning (pp. vii-ix). Singapore: Springer
Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2004). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. Berkshire: Mc-Graw Hill Education.
Bransford, J. D., Barron, B., Pea, R. D., Meltzoff, A., Kuhl, P., Bell, P., . . . Sabelli, N. H. (2006). Foundations and opportunities for an interdisciplinary science of learning. In K. R. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 19-34). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethink transfer. A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 61-100.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ford, D. Y., & Harris III, J. (1992). The elusive definition of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 26(3), 186-198.
Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1984). Two courses of expertise. Research and Clinical Center for Child Development Annual Report, 6, 27-36.
Hatano, G., & Oura, Y. (2003). Commentary: Reconceptualising school learning using insight from expertise research. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 26-29.
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. Retrieved from York, UK.
Kek, M. Y. C. A., & Huijser, H. (2017). Problem-based learning into the future: Imagining an agile PBL ecology for learning. Singapore: Springer.
Kek, M. Y. C. A., Kimmins, L., Lawrence, J., & Abawi, L. A. (2017). Students’ enabling students in a student partnership project: A case study emerging from the OLT Transforming Practice Project on Student Partnership. Student Success, 8(2), 117-122. Retrieved from https://studentsuccessjournal.org/article/view/389/407
Parkhurst, H. B. (1999). Confusion, lack of consensus and the definition of creativity as a construct. Journal of Creative Behavior, 33(1), 1-121.
Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2007). Framework for 21st century learning. Tucson, AZ: Partnership for 21st Century Skills.
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92-96.
Savin-Baden, M. (2008). Learning Spaces: Creating opportunities for knowledge creation in academic life. Buckingham: McGraw-Hill Education.
Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. The Journal of Psychology, 36(3), 311-322.
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). What is an expert student? Educational Researcher, 32(8), 5-9.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). MInd in society: The development of higher mental processes. In M. Cole & S. Scribner (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge: Harvard Business Press.
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).