Co-creating the Curriculum

  • Helen Potkin Kingston University

Abstract

This article takes the form of the letter entering into dialogue with students about their experience of co-creating the curriculum and undertaking a creative assessment. It draws on a case study from an art history module, Researching the Contemporary, studied as part of a joint honours Fine Art and Art History undergraduate course. It examines the ways in which theory and practice could be connected through an understanding of research as a creative practice. In framing co-creation as a creative process which produces different ways of being as learners, the article assesses various reconfigurations of relationships: to learning, to each other, to research, to the institution and to our emotions. The main part is structured in response to issues and ideas raised by a student collaborator, reflecting on the contexts of co-creation, the intersections between how and what we were learning, the links between history, theory and practice and our positionality as learners, researchers, producers and creators. It argues for the productive nature of vulnerability, uncertainty and risk and the potentiality of not-knowing for engendering forms of creative thinking and doing essential for the learning process. 

Author Biography

Helen Potkin, Kingston University

Helen Potkin is Associate Professor of Art History at Kingston University, where she leads the BA Fine Art and Art History as well as teaching Critical and Historical Studies to Fine Art students. 

References

Atkinson, D. (2013). The Blindness of Education to the ‘Untimeliness’ of Real Learning. https://www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/departments/education/web-files2/JBurke-Symposium- /Dennis-Atkinson.pdf

Allen, F. (Ed.). (2011). Education (Whitechapel: Documents of Contemporary art). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. London: Verso

Bovill, C., Cook‐Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co‐creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: implications for academic developers, International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133-145

Britzman, D. (1989). Lost Subjects, Contested Objects. Albany: State University of New York Press

Guattari, F. (2006). Chaosmosis: An Ethico-Aesthetic Paradigm. Sydney: Power Publications

Hall, J. (2015). Co-creating a social justice and education curriculum with undergraduate students. York: Higher Education Academy.

Healey, M. & Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. York: Higher Education Academy.

Healey, M., Flint, A. & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy.

Holly, M. A. & Smith, M. (Eds.). (2009). What is Research in the Visual Arts? Obsession, Archive Encounter. Yale: Yale University Press.

Kester, G. (2004). Conversation Pieces: Community and Communication in Modern Art. California: University of California Press.

Lubicz-Nawrocka, T. (2016). Co-Creation of the Curriculum and Social Justice: Changing the Nature of Student-Teacher Relationships in Higher Education. Higher Education Close Up, Lancaster University.

McWilliam, E. (2008). Unlearning how to teach, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(3), 263-269.

McWilliam, E. (2009). Teaching for creativity: from sage to guide to meddler,

Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 29(3), 281-293.

Martin, P., Morris, R., Rogers, A., Martin, V. & Kilgallon, S. (2009, October). Encouraging creativity in Higher Education: the experience of the Brighton Creativity Centre, Dialogues in Art & Design. Group for Learning in Art and Design (GLAD) conference. ADM Higher Education Academy.

Neary, M. & Winn, J. (2009). The student as producer: Reinventing the student experience in higher education.’ In Bell, L., Stevenson, H., & Neary, M. (Eds.), The future of higher education: Policy, pedagogy and the student experience, (pp192-210). London: Continuum.

Power, N. (2010). Axiomatic equality. Rancière and the politics of contemporary education, Polygraph Eurozine. https://www.eurozine.com/axiomatic-equality/

Rancière, J. (1991). The Ignorant Schoolmaster: Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.

Rintoul, J. (2014). Theory and (in) practice: The problem of integration in art and design education. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 33(3), 345-354.

Rogers, C. (1994). Freedom to Learn, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Rogers, C. (2004). On Becoming a Person, London: Robinson.

Willis, P. and Gregory, A. (2016). Making the road while walking: co-creation, teaching excellence and university leadership, Stimulus paper, Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.

Published
2019-11-08
How to Cite
Potkin, H. (2019). Co-creating the Curriculum. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 2(3), 154-171. Retrieved from https://sehej.raise-network.com/raise/article/view/871