Post-pandemic student engagement: Towards techno-humanistic reflexivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66561/sehej.v7i3.1454Keywords:
Engagement, Humanism, Post-pandemic education, Technology, UNESCOAbstract
This opinion piece examines how student engagement is understood and practised in contemporary higher education, where technological innovation and humanistic values increasingly intersect (see Bond et al., 2020). It approaches the concept through a techno-humanistic lens, arguing that recent conceptualisations of engagement, grounded in socio-cultural perspectives, draw on humanistic principles, such as self-actualisation, creativity, and personal growth, realised through relational interactions and collaborative learning. In contemporary educational environments, these principles are enacted and mediated through digital technologies, enabling students to engage both collaboratively and independently. Noddings (2013) illustrates how human-centred principles of care and responsibility can guide educational relationships, providing an ethical framework that can be extended to digitally mediated learning. This framework resonates with UNESCO’s (2021, 2022) framing of education as a public good, linking individual development to broader social responsibility. Viewed through this techno-humanistic lens, engagement can be understood as a reflexive, contextually mediated practice in which human agency and technological mediation interact to shape meaningful learning that supports individual development while fostering broader social responsibility. This perspective highlights that prevailing understandings remain incomplete without recognising the intertwined humanistic, technological, and ethical conditions shaping post-pandemic student engagement.
Downloads
References
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Buntins, K., Kerres, M., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2020). Facilitating student engagement in higher education through educational technology: A narrative systematic review in the field ofeducation. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 20(2), 315-368.
Bryson, C. (2014). Clarifying the concept of student engagement. In C. Bryson (Ed.), Understanding and developing student engagement (pp. 1-22). Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge.
Bryson, C. (2016). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 84–86.
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Cook-Sather, A., Allard, S., Marcovici, E., & Reynolds, B. (2021). Fostering Agentic Engagement: Working toward Empowerment and Equity through Pedagogical Partnership. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(2), Art. 3.
Felten, P., & Lambert, L. M. (2020). Relationship-rich education: How human connections drive success in college. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
Gulliksen, J., Lilliesköld, J., & Stenbom, S. (2023). The ‘new’ new normal—digitalization and hybridization of work and education before, during and after the Covid-19 pandemic. Interacting with Computers, 35(5), 691-706.
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York, United Kingdom: Higher Education Academy.
Joksimović, S., Poquet, O., Kovanović, V., Dowell, N., Mills, C., Gašević, D., & Brooks, C. (2018). How do we model learning at scale? A systematic review of research on MOOCs. Review of Educational Research, 88(1), 43-86.
Kahu, E.R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758-773.
Kahu, E.R., & Nelson, K. (2018). Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 58-71.
Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper.
Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education. 3rd Edn. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
Northern Illinois University. (n.d.). Recommendations to increase student engagement in online courses. Retrieved from https://www.niu.edu/citl/resources/guides/increase-student-engagement-in-online-courses.shtml
Parida, S., Dhakal, S. P., Dayaram, K., Mohammadi, H., Ayentimi, D. T., Amankwaa, A., & D’Cruz, D. (2023). Rhetoric and realities in Australian universities of student engagement in online learning: Implications for a post-pandemic era. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100795.
Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2021). Balancing technology, pedagogy and the new normal: Post-pandemic challenges for higher education. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(3), 715-742.
Reeve, J., Cheon, S. H., & Jang, H. (2020). How and why students make academic progress: Reconceptualizing the student engagement construct to increase its explanatory power. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62, 101899.
Rogers, C. (1961). On Becoming a Person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Sato, S. N., Condes Moreno, E., Rubio-Zarapuz, A., Dalamitros, A. A., Yañez-Sepulveda, R., Tornero-Aguilera, J. F., & Clemente-Suárez, V. J. (2023). Navigating the new normal: Adapting online and distance learning in the post-pandemic era. Education Sciences, 14(1), Art. 19.
Selwyn, N., Hillman, T., Bergviken-Rensfeldt, A., & Perrotta, C. (2023). Making sense of the digital automation of education. Postdigital Science and Education, 5(1), 1-14.
Teräs, M., Suoranta, J., Teräs, H., & Curcher, M. (2020). Post-Covid-19 education and education technology ‘solutionism’: A seller’s market. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 863-878.
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2022). Humanizing digital transformation in education: A policy guide. Paris: UNESCO.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
