Students as Partners in Peer Review of Teaching: A Collaborative Model Involving the Students’ Union
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66561/sehej.v7i3.1442Keywords:
Peer reviews of teaching, Students as Partners (SaP), Teaching Practice, Higher Education, Student Voice, Students' UnionAbstract
In this paper we highlight the benefits of engaging with internal (academic reviewers and student reviewers) and external (Students’ Union) stakeholders in the implementation of a voluntary system of reviews of teaching in Higher Education. In particular, we describe our experience in introducing such a model in a research-intensive institution in the UK and reflect on the conditions and challenges for such a scheme to bring positive change in terms of teaching practices, academic culture and student experience.
Downloads
References
Ackerman, D., Gross, B. L., & Vigneron, F. (2009). Peer Observation Reports and Student Evaluations of Teaching: Who Are the Experts? Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 55(1). https://doi.org/10.11575/ajer.v55i1.55272
Anderson, A., Austin, D., Walton, C., Wood, A., Houlihan, A., Hard, E., & Bailey, K. (2023). Planning for co-curricular design-student voice, power dynamics and threshold learning: A thematic analysis of the student perspective. International Journal for Students As Partners, 7(1), 18–38. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v7i1.4937
Bell, M. (2001). Supported reflective practice: a programme of peer observation and feedback for academic teaching development. International Journal for Academic Development, 6:1, 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440110033643
Bernstein, D.J., Jonson, J., & Smith, K. (2000). An Examination of the Implementation of Peer Review of Teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2000: 73-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.8306
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71, 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4
Cook-Sather, A. (2011). Layered learning: student consultants deepening classroom and life lessons. Educational Action Research, 19:1, 41-57, https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2011.547680
Cook-Sather, A. (2014). Student-faculty partnership in explorations of pedagogical practice: a threshold concept in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 19:3, 186-198, https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2013.805694
Cook-Sather, A. (2016). Undergraduate students as partners in new faculty orientation and academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2016.1156543
Cook-Sather, A. (2023). Three models for embracing student expertise in the development of pedagogical partnership programs. International Journal for Students As Partners, 7(2), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v7i2.5416
Cook-Sather, A., (2024). Rethinking time in preparing for and reflecting on teaching: Pedagogical partnership with student consultants as empowering educational development. To Improve the Academy: A Journal of Educational Development, 43(1): 10. https://doi.org/10.3998/tia.4793
Dall'Alba, G. (2018). Reframing expertise and its development: A lifeworld perspective. In K. Ericsson, R. Hoffman, A. Kozbelt, & A. Williams (Eds.). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 33–39). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Douglas, A., & Douglas, J. (2006). Campus spies? Using mystery students to evaluate university performance. Educational Research, 48:1, 111-119, https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880500498560
Drake, D. (2024). Students as partners for effective change: Bring students into the center of decision making. International Journal for Students As Partners, 8(1), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v8i1.5552
Gosling, D. (2002). Models of peer-observation of teaching. Learning and Teaching Support Network, Generic Centre. Available online at: www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources.
Gosling, D. (2014). Collaborative Peer-Supported Review of Teaching. In: Sachs, J., Parsell, M. (eds) Peer Review of Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7639-5_2
Hammersley‐Fletcher, L., & Orsmond, P. (2004). Evaluating our peers: is peer observation a meaningful process? Studies in Higher Education, 29:4, 489-503. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507042000236380
Hammersley‐Fletcher, L., & Orsmond, P. (2005). Reflecting on reflective practices within peer observation. Studies in Higher Education, 30:2, 213-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500043358
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. Higher Education Academy.
Kolb, A., & Kolb, D. (2018). Eight Important Things to Know About the Experiential Learning Cycle, Australian Educational Leader, 40 (3):8-14.
Korpan, C., & Murray, D. (2025). Expanding peer observation of teaching and learning through cross-institutional collaboration. International Journal for Academic Development, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2025.2526554
Land, R. (2011). There could be trouble ahead: Using threshold concepts as a tool of analysis. International Journal for Academic Development, 16, 175–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.568747
Land, R., Cousin, G., Meyer, J. H. F., & Davies, P. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (3): Implications for course design and evaluation. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning: Diversity and inclusivity (pp. 53–64). Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
Lipmanowicz, H., Singhal, A., McCandless, K., & Wang, H. (2015). Liberating structures: Engaging everyone to build a good life together. In H. Wang (Ed.), Communication and "the good life" (International Communication Association Theme Book Series, Vol. 2, pp. 233-246). New York: Peter Lang.
McAnally, S., Buczynski, J., & Kavanagh, L. (2024). Student Led Observations for Course Improvement (SLOCI): Closing the loop in course enhancement, International Journal for Students as Partners, 8 (2). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v8i2.5578
McMahon, T., Barrett, T., & O'Neill, G. (2007). Using observation of teaching to improve quality: finding your way through the muddle of competing conceptions, confusion of practice and mutually exclusive intentions. Teaching in Higher Education, 12:4, 499-511, https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510701415607
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., … Swaim, K. (2017). A Systematic Literature Review of Students as Partners in Higher Education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
O’Keeffe, M., Crehan, M., Munro, M., Logan, A., Farrell, A. M., Clarke, E., Flood, M., Ward, M., Andreeva, T., Van Egeraat, C., Heaney, F., Curran, D., & Clinton, E. (2021). Exploring the role of peer observation of teaching in facilitating cross-institutional professional conversations about teaching and learning. International Journal for Academic Development, 26(3), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2021.1954524
O’Leary, M. (2022). Rethinking teachers’ professional learning through unseen observation. Professional Development in Education, 50(6), 1162–1175. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2022.2125551
O’Leary, M., & Cui, V. (2018). Reconceptualising Teaching and learning in higher education: challenging neoliberal narratives of teaching excellence through collaborative observation. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1543262
O’Leary, M., & Savage, S. (2019). Breathing new life into the observation of teaching and learning in higher education: moving from the performative to the informative. Professional Development in Education, 46(1), 145–159. https://doi-org.manchester.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1633386
Owen, J., & Wasiuk, C. (2021). An agile approach to co-creation of the curriculum. International Journal for Students as Partners, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v5i2.4475
Quenette,A., & Rybas, N. (2023). Evaluating instructor quality: Moving away from student evaluations to peer review. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20535
Smith, H. (2012). The unintended consequences of grading teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 17:6, 747-754, https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.744437
Stigler, J.W., & Miller, K.F. Expertise and Expert Performance in Teaching. In: Ericsson KA, Hoffman RR, Kozbelt A, Williams AM, (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology. Cambridge University Press; 2018:431-452.
Woolmer, C., & Tran, L. (2024). Exploring the importance of backstage conversations in student-faculty partnerships. International Journal for Students As Partners, 8(1), 277–283. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v8i1.5522
Zeng, L.M. (2020), Peer review of teaching in higher education: A systematic review of its impact on the professional development of university teachers from the teaching expertise perspective. Educational Research Review, 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100333.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
