Accountable and Empowered - Professionalising Student Voice

Authors

  • Simon Peplow University of Warwick
  • Lydia Plath University of Warwick
  • Tom Chaloner University of Warwick
  • Sarah Inchley University of Warwick
  • Seth Reece University of Warwick
  • Arushi Singhai University of Warwick

Keywords:

Accountibility, Empower, Student Voice

Abstract

Incorporating Student Voice in institutional decision-making and strategic work is an extremely important and valued aspect of higher education (HE). This case study explores the challenges and opportunities related to embedding student voice within the University of Warwick's History Department. We highlight the limitations of traditional course representation systems and identify a need for a more professional and accountable approach. The department introduced paid Student Voice Ambassador (SVA) roles to ensure meaningful and diverse student participation in departmental governance. This approach has led to improved student engagement, more effective decision-making, and enhanced collaboration between students and staff. Its success is evidenced by positive feedback from both students and staff. In this article, both staff and students involved in this process reflect on the importance of professional conduct, accountability, and empowerment in the SVA role. We also consider future plans to further integrate and promote the role within the broader student body. Our experiences have demonstrated that professionalising student voice through paid roles can significantly enhance the impact and legitimacy of student contributions in HE.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bovill, C. (2013). Students and staff co-creating curricula: An example of good practice in higher education? In E. Dunne & D. Owen (Eds.), The student engagement handbook: Practice in higher education (pp.461– 75). Emerald.

Bryson, C. (2014). Understanding and Developing Student Engagement. Routledge.

Carey, P. (2012). Representation and Student Engagement in Higher Education: A Reflection on the Views and Experiences of Course Representatives. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 37(1), 71–88. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2011.644775.

Chang, G. (2023). How is university students’ paid work associated with their locus of control. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 83. doi:10.1016/j.rssm.2023.100764.

Cuthbert, R. (2010). Students as customers? High Education Review, 42(3), 3–25.

Dickinson, J. (2020). #SUFutures – Course reps were the future once. WonkHE. https://wonkhe.com/blogs-sus/course-reps-were-the-future-once/

Felten, P. (2020). Critically reflecting on identities, particularities and relationships in student engagement. In T. Lowe & Y. El Hakim (Eds.), A Handbook for Student Engagement in Higher Education (pp.148–54. Routledge.

Fielding, M. (2004). Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 295–311. doi:10.1080/0141192042000195236

Flint, A. & O’Hara, M. (2013). Communities of practice and ‘student voice’: engaging with student representatives at the faculty level. Student Engagement and Experience Journal, 2(1).

Holland, S., Budd, A., McGuire, C., Williams, M. & Peplow, S. (2023). History UK: History, Pedagogy and EDI project report. https://www.history-uk.ac.uk/history-uk-history-pedagogy-and-edi-project-report/

Hordósy, R., & Clark, T. (2018). Beyond the Compulsory: A Critical Exploration of the Experiences of Extracurricular Activity and Employability in a Northern Red Brick University. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 23(3), 414–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2018.1490094.

Kuh, G.W. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. American Association of Colleges and Universities.

lair, K., & Noel, K.V. (2014). Improving Higher Education Practice through Student Evaluation Systems: Is the Student Voice Being Heard?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 879–894. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.875984

Little, B., Locke, W., Scesa, A. & Williams, R. (2009). Report to HEFCE on student engagement. CHERI, The Open University.

Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2009). Student participation in university governance: the role conceptions and sense of efficacy of student representatives on departmental committees. Studies in Higher Education, 34(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802602000

McPherson, N.G, & Heggie, G. (2015). Transitioning to Students as Partners, Producers, Collaborators and Co-creators. Are We Serious? Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education. Glasgow: QAA Enhancement Themes. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Neil-Mcpherson/publication/283949340_Transitioning_to_Students_as_Partners_Producers_Collaborators_and_Co-creators_Are_We_Serious/links/564a58b808ae127ff9869882/Transitioning-to-Students-as-Partners-Producers-Collaborators-and-Co-creators-Are-We-Serious.pdf

Menon, M.E. (2003). Student Involvement in University Governance: A Need for Negotiated Educational Aims? Tertiary Education and Management, 9, 233-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2003.9967106

Quaye, S.J. & Harper, S.R. (Eds.). (2014). Student Engagement in Higher Education: Theoretical Perspectives and Practical Approaches for Diverse Populations. Routledge.

Reynolds, A. (2022). ‘Where does my £9000 go?’ Student identities in a marketised British Higher Education Sector. SN Soc Sci, 2(125). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00432-6.

Rothwell, D. (2024). Initial teacher education seminars and minority ethnic students: exploring dialogic teaching and engagement. Teaching in Higher Education, 30(2), 444-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2024.2354261

Schofield, C. (2024). The impact of the cost-of-living crisis on online student engagement and future study plans. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 29(3), 502-519. doi:10.1080/13596748.2024.2371643.

Taylor, L. (2024). Why we need students to act more like consumers. https://wonkhe.com/blogs/why-we-need-students-to-act-more-like-consumers/.

Thomas, L. (2016). Developing Inclusive Learning to Improve the Engagement, Belonging, Retention, and Success of Students from Diverse Groups. In M. Shah, A. Bennett, and E. Southgate (Eds.), Widening Higher Education Participation. (pp.135–159). Elsevier.

Tyrrell, J. & Varnham, S. (2015). The Student Voice in University Decision-making. In S. Varnham, P. Kamvounias & J Squelch (Eds.), Higher Education and the Law (pp. 30–40). Federation Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-23

How to Cite

Peplow, S., Plath, L., Chaloner, T., Inchley, S., Reece, S., & Singhai, A. (2025). Accountable and Empowered - Professionalising Student Voice. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 7(1), 131–138. Retrieved from https://sehej.raise-network.com/raise/article/view/1410

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Engaging with the Student Voice Special Edition: Refreshing Practice and Theory – A reboot for 2025 and beyond

Section

Case studies/Practice Pieces

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a.  Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b.  Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

c.  Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).