Amplifying Student Voice in the Creation of a Hybrid Community Space
Keywords:
Student Voice, Community Building, Student Engagement, Partnered Learning Community, Hybrid Community Space, BelongingAbstract
This practice-based case study reports on evidence generated from the implementation of a hybrid community space as a new method to engage with students’ voice. This innovative model moves the concept of student voice away from the conventional and hierarchical approach currently in place in Higher Education to engage with students as part of a partnered learning community.
This project involved a large undergraduate cohort of around 500 students in the design and implementation process, ensuring that the space truly reflected their needs and preferences. By empowering students to actively participate and make decisions, the project aimed to foster a sense of ownership, enhance social connections, and support community-building activities within the cohort.
By emphasising the importance of fostering a sense of belonging among students and integrating activities related to sustainable development goals, the case study speaks to broader issues of student well-being, and social and environmental responsibility. Additionally, the case study emphasises the importance of student voice and agency in shaping educational experiences, sparking innovation and fostering stronger connections between students and academics.
Downloads
References
Baik, C., Larcombe, W., & Brooker, A. (2019). How universities can enhance student mental wellbeing: the student perspective. Higher Education Research and Development, 38(4), 674–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1576596
Blake, S., Capper, G. & Jackson, A. (2022). Building Belonging in Higher Education: Recommendations for developing an integrated institutional approach. Pearson/WONKHE. https://wonkhe.com/wp-content/wonkhe-uploads/2022/10/Building-Belonging-October-2022.pdf
Conner, J., Mitra, D. L., Holquist, S. E., & Boat, A. (2025). How teachers’ student voice practices affect student engagement and achievement: Exploring choice, receptivity, and responsiveness to student voice as moderators. Journal of Educational Change, 26(1), 89-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-024-09513-0
Dollinger, M. (2023) Critical challenges to support Generation Z learners. In Lowe, T. (Ed.). Advancing student engagement in higher education: reflection, critique and challenge, (pp147-155). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003271789
Fielding, M. (2011). Patterns of partnership: Student voice, intergenerational learning and democratic fellowship. In N. Mockler & J. Sachs (Eds.), Rethinking educational practice through reflexive inquiry (Vol. 7, pp. 61–75). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0805-1_5
Gilani, D. (2023, October 16). Building belonging a year on – how has higher education changed? WONKHE. https://wonkhe.com/blogs/building-belonging-a-year-on-how-has-the-sector-changed/
Hollister, B., Nair, P., Hill-Lindsay, S., & Chukoskie, L. (2022). Engagement in online learning: Student attitudes and behavior during COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 7, 851019. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.851019
Husbands, C. & Kay, J. (2025, February 28). New Rules of Engagement. Higher Futures. https://higherfutures.co.uk/new-rules-of-engagement/
Jones, P., Selby, D., & Sterling, S. R. (Eds.) (2010). Sustainability education: perspectives and practice across higher education. Earthscan.
McKinsey & Company (2024) What is Gen Z? https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explainers/what-is-gen-z
Nussbaum, M. C. (1997). Cultivating humanity: a classical defense of reform in liberal education. Harvard University Press.
O'Hara, M. (2023, October 3). We’re better together: Let’s co-create! Advance HE. Retrieved April 26, 2025, from https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/news-and-views/were-better-together-lets-co-create. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-491-120191013
Parry, E. and Battista, V. (2019), Generation Z in the UK: More of the Same – High Standards and Demands. In Scholz, C. and Rennig, A. (Eds.), Generations Z in Europe (The Changing Context of Managing People), (pp. 89-107) Emerald Publishing
Sivalingam, R. (2023, November 10). Partnering with students to build belonging in a blended learning environment. Campus. Times Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/partnering-students-build-belonging-blended-learning-environment
Stein, S. J., Goodchild, A., Moskal, A., Terry, S., & McDonald, J. (2020). Student perceptions of student evaluations: enabling student voice and meaningful engagement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(6), 837-851. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1824266
Sullivan, D., Lakeman, R., Massey, D., Nasrawi, D., Tower, M., & Lee, M. (2023). Student motivations, perceptions and opinions of participating in student evaluation of teaching surveys: a scoping review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(2), 178-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2199486
Thomas, L. (2012). Building student engagement and belonging in Higher Education at a time of change: A summary of findings and recommendations from the What Works? Student Retention & Success programme. Paul Hamlyn Foundation & HEFCE. https://www.improvingthestudentexperience.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/What_Works_Summary_Report.pdf
Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in Peer Learning. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 631-645. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500345172
Young, H., & Jerome, L. (2020). Student voice in higher education: Opening the loop. British Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 688-705. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3603
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).