‘Because you trusted me, I trust me’: A Case Study Exploring the Transformative Potential of Student-Staff Partnerships in Co-Creating Institutional Policy
Keywords:
Staff-student partnership, Co-production, Institutional PolicyAbstract
This case study explores the transformative potential of student-staff partnerships in the co-creation of an institutional teaching and learning plan. The findings are presented and discussed by the two co-authors, the student representative from the group and one of the Associate Deans, and resonate with existing scholarship on student-staff collaboration, emphasising the potential of these partnerships to shift traditional power dynamics, foster epistemic confidence, and promote a more equitable academic environment. This paper presents the experience of the student representative who participated in the co-creation process, highlighting the empowering nature of this involvement and the importance of student-focused leadership in fostering these dynamics. The approach taken may create a slight inconsistency in tone for the reader, as the co-authors present patterns of inquiry whilst also positioning the resulting insights and learning as integral to personal narratives and lived experiences. The case study highlights how student co-creation, in tandem with emergent distributed leadership, facilitated the collaborative development of the teaching and learning strategy and plan. The project was explicitly designed around student co-creation, with the intention of integrating student input 'from the ground up. By valuing and integrating the knowledge and perspectives of diverse stakeholders, this approach not only shaped the plan but also embodied a commitment to inclusive and transformative student engagement.
Downloads
References
Arnstein, S. (1969). A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), pp.216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Bovill, C. (2019). Student–staff partnerships in learning and teaching: an overview of current practice and discourse. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 43(4), pp.385–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2019.1660628
Bovill, C. (2020). Co-creation in learning and teaching: the case for a whole-class approach in higher education. Higher Education, 79, pp.1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00453-w
Boyle, F., Buchanan, F., Ritchie, D. and Gamage, K. (2024) Exploring Staff–Student Partnership in Curriculum Design. Education Sciences, 14(1) https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010061
Brandsen, T., Verschuere, B., and Steen, T. (Eds.). (2018). Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315204956
Braun, V., and Clarke, V. (2022). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), pp.1–6. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597
Clandinin, D. and Connolly, F. (2004) Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1321103X060270010301
Cook-Sather, A. (2020). Respecting voices: How the co-creation of teaching and learning can support academic staff, underrepresented students, and equitable practices. Higher Education, 79, pp.885-901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00445-w
Cook-Sather, A. and Kaur, A. (2022) Embracing epistemic confidence, open-mindedness, and co-creation: An exploration of how the psychological constructs of attitudes and intentions can inform staff contributions to successful student-staff partnership. Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change, 8(2). https://journals.studentengagement.org.uk/index.php/studentchangeagents/article/view/1119
Creswell, J. (2014) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n5p40
Curtin, M., & McMullin, C. (2025). The co-production spectrum: conceptual blurs in theory and practice. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvaf008
Delgado-Bernal, D. (2002). Critical race theory, Latino critical theory, and critical raced-gendered epistemologies: Recognizing students of color as holders and creators of knowledge. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), pp.105-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040200800107
Dunlop, L., Rushton, E. A. C., Atkinson, L., Blake, C., Calvert, S., Cornelissen, E., … Yuan, X. (2021). An introduction to the co-creation of policy briefs with youth and academic teams. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 47(1), pp.149–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2021.2001793
Field, J., Merrill, B. and West, L. (2012). Life history approaches to access and retention of non-traditional students in higher education: A cross-European approach. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 3(1), pp.77-89. https://doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela0062
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), pp.219-245 https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
Healey, M., Flint, A., and Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: HE Academy. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/engagement-through-partnership-students-partners-learning-and-teaching-higher
Jones, S., Harvey, M., Hamilton, J., Bevacqua, J., Egea, K., and McKenzie, J. (2017). Demonstrating the impact of a distributed leadership approach in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(2), pp.197–211. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1360080X.2017.1276567
Lubicz-Nawrocka, T. M. (2019). “More than just a student”: How co-creation of the curriculum fosters third spaces in ways of working, identity, and impact. International Journal for Students As Partners, 3(1), pp.34–49. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v3i1.3727
Sebolao, R. (2023). Enhancing Academic Development: A reflexive exploration of Staff and Students’ Experiences on curriculum co-creation. Research in Educational Policy and Management, 5(3), pp.165-179. https://doi.org/10.46303/repam.2023.29
Smith, J., Flower, P. and Larkin, M. (2009. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. London: SAGE Publications https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14780880903340091
Stake, R.(1995).The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Van Ameijde, J., Nelson, P., Billsberry, J. and Van Meurs, N. (2009) Improving leadership in higher education institutions: A distributed perspective. Higher Education, 58(6), pp.763–779. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10734-009-9224-y
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).