Collaborative drawing as a tool for creating a sense of community within NTU’s Architecture students
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, students studied from home in isolation, communicating digitally through the computer. Some students lost confidence academically, as well as socially. Students’ wellbeing also suffered due to the challenging circumstances of the pandemic. A community of practice (CoP) is one way of tackling this issue and building a sense of community post pandemic. A CoP brings people together who share a passion for something they do and have a desire to further their skills alongside others with the same interest (Wenger-Trayner and Wenger-Trayner, 2015). Students get to know, trust and support each other (Laal and Ghodsi, 2012, p.817), improving the sense of belonging as students work together, consequently benefitting students’ wellbeing.
The Architecture department at Nottingham Trent University (NTU) is exploring collaborative drawing, as a community of practice to improve a sense of belonging, whilst tackling issues related to confidence, perfectionism, and wellbeing. Alongside this, they seek to encourage students to draw more by hand, a skill that is often forgotten or put to one side in favour of digital drawing.
Jessica Payne, Final year Bachelor of Architecture (BArch) student and Holly Mills, Senior Lecturer at NTU have been researching aspects of collaborative drawing together. The collaboration between staff and student was critical as it enabled the scholarly enquiry to be centred on student engagement.
This case study focuses on one session which explored the practice and impact on learning: a ‘Cake & Draw’ workshop hosted by the Architecture Student Society in April 2023. Using a focus group and post workshop surveys, Mills and Payne evaluated the benefits of collaborative drawing. They found that collaborative drawing enabled students to take risks, draw more fluently and accept ‘imperfect’ work. Collaborative drawing was found to expand feelings of community and increase communication between different cohorts, which in turn benefited the student’s wellbeing.
Following Mills and Payne’s scholarly enquiry, the architecture department will implement a drawing area in the studio and adapt the themes of the collaborative drawing workshops to be more closely related to the architecture course.
Downloads
References
Harty, D., & Sawdon, P. (2017). Three States [of dialogue]: You Me Us. In Journeaux, J. & Gorrill, H. (Eds.), Collective and collaborative drawing in contemporary practice : drawing conversations (pp. 98-113). Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Retrieved 5th June 2023.
Chow, A. (2017). Inspiration Drawn: Conversation Around Archives. In Journeaux, J. & Gorrill, H. (Eds.), Collective and collaborative drawing in contemporary practice : drawing conversations (pp. 240-258). Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Retrieved 6th June 2023.
Hegenauer. (2022). Perfectionism and Self-Compassion in the Design Studio. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Retrieved 13th June 2023 from https://www.proquest.com/openview/551a1e78fc10514f413147e75855a898/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Kantrowitz, A., Fava, M., & Brew, A. (2017). Drawing Together Research and Pedagogy. Art Education (Reston), 70(3), 50–60. Retrieved 5th June 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2017.1286863
Kutlesa, N., & Arthur, N. (2008). Overcoming Negative Aspects of Perfectionism through Group Treatment. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 26(3), 134–150. Retrieved 7th June from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-007-0064-3
Laal, M., & Godshi, S., M. (2012). Benefits of Collaborative learning. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486-490. Retrieved 7th June from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091
Latif, J., Bashir, R. & Akram, B. (2021). Perfectionism, psychological distress and procrastination amongstudents of art and design: a comparative study. Elementary Education Online, 20 (2), 1322-1332. Retrieved 9th June 2023 from doi: 10.17051/ilkonline.2021.02.152
Morris, M. (2013). All Night Long: The Architectural Jazz of the Texas Rangers. Architectural Design, 83(5), 20–27. Retrieved 9th June 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1658
Nottingham Trent University, (n.d.)a. About TILT. Nottingham Trent University. Retrieved 15th June 2023 from https://www.ntu.ac.uk/c/tilt/about-tilt
Nottingham Trent University, (n.d.)b. Annual Learning and Teaching Conference. Nottingham Trent University. Retrieved 15 June from https://www.ntu.ac.uk/c/tilt/ALTC
Russel, J., Thompson, M., and Jones, A. (2021). Study Architecture Well. RIBA. Retrieved 11th June 2023 from https://www.architecture.com/-/media/GatherContent/Business-Benchmarking/Additional-Documents/RIBA-Study-Architecture-Wellpdf.pdf
Thurlow, L., & Ford, P. (2017). Where have all the ideas gone? An anatomy of sketch inhibition in student designers. The Design Society. Retrieved 12th June 2023 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335567891_Where_have_all_the_ideas_gone_An_anatomy_of_sketch_inhibition_among_student_designers
Wenger-Trayner, E. and Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015) An introduction to communities of practice: a brief overview of the concept and its uses. Available from authors. Retrieved 9th November 2023 from https://www.wenger-trayner.com/introduction-to-communities-of-practice.
Wenger, McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice : a guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business Review Press. Retrieved 12th June 2023 from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40214602
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).